Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268123›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Why Are Enrichment Practices in Zoos Difficult to Implement Effectively?

Eileen K Tuite, Simon A Moss, Clive J Phillips, Samantha J Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A meta-analysis of the effect of visiting zoos and aquariums on visitors' conservation knowledge, beliefs, and behavior.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Animal Welfare, Agency, and Animal-Computer Interaction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Human-Animal Bonds for People Experiencing Crisis Situations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eileen K TuiteCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
Simon A MossCollege of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
Clive J PhillipsInstitute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51014 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-6357
Samantha J WardSchool of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell NG25 0AJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5857-1071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The good intentions of zoos to introduce enrichment practices that stimulate animals mentally and physically are not always achievable. Changes to the policies and procedures in organisations are difficult to fulfil for a range of reasons frequently investigated in change management literature. The implementation of these changes can be the source of ineffective attempts to generate positive interventions in organisations. In this study, we investigate whether interventions to improve animal management in zoos through enrichment are subject to implementation impediments. Qualitative data gathered from interviews with 23 keepers working with big cats across 12 zoos globally provided valuable insights into the barriers and enablers to the implementation of enrichment. Keepers participated voluntarily and worked in accredited zoos across Australia, New Zealand, Europe, south-east Asia, South Africa, and the United States of America. Thematic analysis of the data revealed five key themes that described some of the challenges zoos and keepers experience when implementing enrichment for big cats, in their words:

Indexed as

big catsenrichmentkeepersprocess evaluationthematic analysiszoo management

Identifiers

PMID35268123
PMCPMC8908830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.