Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268047›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Body Composition Assessment in Mexican Children and Adolescents. Part 1: Comparisons between Skinfold-Thickness, Dual X-ray Absorptiometry, Air-Displacement Plethysmography, Deuterium Oxide Dilution, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging with the 4-C Model.

Desiree Lopez-Gonzalez, Jonathan C K Wells, Alicia Parra-Carriedo, Gladys Bilbao, Martín Mendez, Patricia Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Desiree Lopez-GonzalezClinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gomez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2299-1576
Jonathan C K WellsChildhood Nutrition Research Centre Population, Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-8025
Alicia Parra-CarriedoHealth Department, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City 01219, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6140-9294
Gladys BilbaoHealth Department, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City 01219, Mexico.
Martín MendezCentro Nacional de Investigacion en Imagenologia e Instrumentacion Medica, Mexico City 09340, Mexico.
Patricia ClarkClinical Epidemiology Research Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gomez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7981-5357

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 2015-2 261682seca gmbh & co. kg Hammer Steindamm 3-25 22089 Hamburg | Germany 055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of body composition (BC) is relevant in the evaluation of children's health-disease states. Different methods and devices are used to estimate BC. The availability of methods and the clinical condition of the patient usually defines the ideal approach to be used. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluate the accuracy of different methods to estimate BC in Mexican children and adolescents, using the 4-C model as the reference. In a sample of 288 Mexican children and adolescents, 4-C body composition assessment, skinfold-thickness (SF), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), air displacement plethysmography (ADP), and deuterium dilution (D

Indexed as

Body CompositionPlethysmographyAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesDeuterium OxideHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingDeuterium Oxideair-displacement plethysmography (ADP)body compositionchildren and adolescentsdeuterium dilutiondual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)MRI 6skinfold-thickness

Identifiers

PMID35268047
PMCPMC8912681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.