Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35268042›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

A Survey to Identify the Current Management of Cow's Milk Disorders and the Role of Goat Milk-Based Formulas in the Middle East and North Africa Region.

Wael A Bahbah, Mostafa ElHodhod, Mohamed Salah, Fawaz AlRefaee, Muath AlTuraiki, Samira Mousa, Ali Al Mehaidib, Wafaa Helmi Ayesh, Ahmed N El-Bazzar, Joseph El Haddad and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The prebiotic potential of lactobin and glucans combined with goat's milk in cats.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Wael A BahbahDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6145-0572
Mostafa ElHodhodFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0966-5466
Mohamed SalahEgyptian Academy of Pediatrics, Cairo 11311, Egypt.
Fawaz AlRefaeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Al Adan Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City P.O. Box 46969, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-7980-1518
Muath AlTuraikiDepartment of Pediatrics, King Salman Hospital, Riyadh 12769, Saudi Arabia.
Samira MousaMedical Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Benha University, Benha 13518, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4001-4568
Ali Al MehaidibDepartment of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
Wafaa Helmi AyeshDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai P.O. Box 4545, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmed N El-BazzarDepartment of Pediatrics, Ministry of Health Hospitals, Cairo 12613, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-7876
Joseph El HaddadDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saint George University Hospital, Beirut 1100, Lebanon.
Heba Y El KhashabDepartment of Pediatrics, Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Group, Riyadh 12214, Saudi Arabia.
Amr El ZawahryPediatrics Department, King's College Hospital London, Dubai P.O. Box 340901, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammed HasosahKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, National Guard Hospital, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah 21482, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8434-2109
Sanaa Youssef ShaabanDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt.
Yvan VandenplasKidZ Health Castle, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-8651
Ain Shams University · EGAdan Hospital · KWBenha University · EGDubai Health Authority · AEDubai Hospital · AEKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAMenoufia University · EGMinistry of Health and Population · EGSaint George Hospital · LBVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCow's milk allergy (CMA) and cow's milk intolerance (CMI) are the major cow's milk disorders observed in infants and young children. This study investigates, for the first time, physician knowledge regarding CMA and CMI prevalence, diagnosis, and management in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. In addition, we explore the role of goat milk-based formula as an alternative in infants suffering from CMI.

methodThis cross-sectional survey was conducted from December 2020 to February 2021. A convenience sample of 2500 MENA-based physicians received the questionnaire, developed by a working group of pediatric experts.

results1868 physicians completed the questionnaire, including pediatric specialists (80.8%), training physicians (0.2%), dermatologists (0.1%), family/general physicians (12.9%), neonatologists (3.6%), neurosurgeons (0.2%), allergy nurse specialists (0.3%), pharmacists (2.1%), and public health workers (0.1%). Differentiation between CMA and CMI was recognized by the majority of respondents (80.7%), for which the majority of respondents (35.4%) identified that the elimination and challenge test was the best test to differentiate CMA from CMI, whereas 30.7% and 5.4% preferred the immunoglobulin E (IgE) test and skin prick test, respectively. In addition, 28.5% of respondents reported that there is no confirmatory test to differentiate CMA from CMI. The majority of respondents (47.3%) reported that amino acid-based formula (AAF)/ extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF) is the cornerstone for the management of CMA. However, most respondents (33.7%) reported that lactose avoidance was best for the management of CMI. Overall, 65% of the respondents were aware of nutritionally adapted goat's milk formula as an alternative to cow's milk products and 37% would recommend its routine use in infants (≤2 years of age).

conclusionThe results of this survey demonstrate that the majority of physicians are aware of the underlying pathophysiology and management of CMA and CMI. However, a significant proportion of physicians do not follow the clinical guidelines concerning CMA/CMI diagnosis and management. Notably, this survey identified that goat's milk formulas may offer a suitable alternative to AAF/EHF in infants with CMI as they contain β-casein protein which is easily digestible. In addition, goat's milk formulas contain higher levels of oligosaccharides and medium-chained fatty acids compared with standard cow's milk formulas, yet further clinical trials are warranted to support the inclusion of goat's milk formulas in clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

GoatsMilkAfrica, NorthernAnimalsCattleChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle EastSurveys and Questionnairescow’s milk allergycow’s milk intolerancegoat milk-based formulasMiddle East and North Africa

Identifiers

PMID35268042
PMCPMC8912394
OpenAlexW4214918910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.