Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267972›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Impact of Parenteral Glutamine Supplement on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Chih-Chun Wang, Tzer-Zen Hwang, Chuan-Chien Yang, Ching-Feng Lien, Chien-Chung Wang, Yu-Chen Shih, Shyh-An Yeh, Meng-Che Hsieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chih-Chun WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Tzer-Zen HwangDepartment of Otolaryngology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Chuan-Chien YangDepartment of Otolaryngology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Ching-Feng LienDepartment of Otolaryngology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Chien-Chung WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Yu-Chen ShihCollege of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Shyh-An YehCollege of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
Meng-Che HsiehCollege of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
E-Da Hospital · TWI-Shou University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common toxic side effect in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) that has a negative impact on treatment outcomes and patients’ survival. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of parenteral glutamine supplement (dipeptiven) on oncologic outcomes in patients with NPC treated with CCRT. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with pathologically proved NPC and treated with CCRT were enrolled into our study. Patients were classified as dipeptiven (+) and dipeptiven (−). Oncologic outcomes were measured, and multivariate regression analysis was performed. Grade 3−4 treatment related toxicities were also documented. Results: A total of 144 patients with NPC were recruited in this study to evaluate oncologic outcomes, with 41 dipeptiven (+) and 103 dipeptiven (−). CCRT interruption rate and severe adverse effect (SAE) rate were significant lower in the dipeptiven (+) group than in the dipeptiven (−) group. The median overall survival (OS) was not mature yet in the dipeptiven (+) group and 30 months in the dipeptiven (−) group (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that dipeptiven supplementation and CCRT interruption were independent predictors associated with better survival. The OS was longest in patients with a dipeptiven supplement and patients who had CCRT interruption had significantly worst OS. As for safety profiles, grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were fewer in dipeptiven (+) than in dipeptiven (−). Conclusion: Dipeptiven supplementation is crucial in NPC patients treated with CCRT, which can ameliorate treatment-related toxicity and augment treatment efficacy. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate our results.

Indexed as

GlutamineNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDietary SupplementsHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaGlutaminechemoradiotherapydipeptivenglutaminenasopharyngeal carcinomaoncologic outcomesoral mucositis

Identifiers

PMID35267972
PMCPMC8912271
OpenAlexW4214517286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.