Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267933›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

An Assessment of Serum Selenium Concentration in Women with Endometrial Cancer.

Magdalena Janowska, Natalia Potocka, Sylwia Paszek, Marzena Skrzypa, Andrzej Wróbel, Marta Kluz, Piotr Baszuk, Wojciech Marciniak, Jacek Gronwald, Jan Lubiński and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selenium-Based Nanoplatforms: An Emerging Theranostic Paradigm for Gynecological Cancers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena JanowskaDepartment of Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No. 1, 35-055 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3132-6436
Natalia PotockaLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Centre for Innovative Research in Medical and Natural Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5505-3922
Sylwia PaszekLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Centre for Innovative Research in Medical and Natural Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-2661
Marzena SkrzypaLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Centre for Innovative Research in Medical and Natural Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Andrzej WróbelSecond Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-0573
Marta KluzDepartment of Pathology, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No. 1, 35-055 Rzeszow, Poland.
Piotr BaszukDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Wojciech MarciniakDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Jacek GronwaldDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-2871
Jan LubińskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2931-3003
Izabela ZawlikLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Centre for Innovative Research in Medical and Natural Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Tomasz KluzDepartment of Gynecology, Gynecology Oncology and Obstetrics, Fryderyk Chopin University Hospital No. 1, 35-055 Rzeszow, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PLFryderyk Chopin University of Music · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies have shown a relationship between low serum selenium levels and an increased risk of developing cancer. Methods: A total of 306 women participated in the study: 153 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 153 healthy women who were matched, in terms of birth year (+/−3 years), to the patients from the study group. The quantitative measurement of selenium content in the collected blood samples was performed using a mass spectrometer with excitation in inductively coupled plasma. In order to determine the relationship between the risk factors and the incidence of endometrial cancer, analyses based on single- and multi-factor conditional logistic regression models were performed. Results: The mean concentration of selenium was lower in patients with endometrial cancer than in healthy controls (60.63 µg/L (0.77 µmol/L) vs. 78.74 µg/L (0.99 µmol/L), respectively). When compared in quartiles, a significant association of lower selenium concentration with the incidence of endometrial cancer was recorded. The highest OR was observed in the first and second quartiles (OR-22.0, p-value < 0.001; medium selenium level 46.95 µg/L (0.59 µmol/L), and OR-5.94; p-value < 0.001; medium selenium level 63.60 µg/L (0.80 µmol/L), respectively). Conclusion: A strong correlation between the level of selenium in the blood serum and the risk of endometrial cancer indicates that patients with low levels should be a candidate group requiring appropriate preventive examinations. Further research on a larger group of patients is required.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsSeleniumFemaleHealth StatusHumansLogistic ModelsRisk FactorsSeleniumcancer preventionendometrial cancermicroelements and endometrial cancerseleniumserum Se leveltrace elementuterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID35267933
PMCPMC8912795
OpenAlexW4214514315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.