ArticlePolymers2022
Investigating the Recyclability of Laser PP CP 75 Polypropylene Powder in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF).
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymeric Powders for Powder Bed Fusion: From Chemistry and Powder Characteristics to Process Parameters, Defects and Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Advanced Numerical Modeling of Powder Bed Fusion: From Physics-Based Simulations to AI-Augmented Digital Twins.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present study, recyclability of Laser PP CP 75 polypropylene powder from Diamond Plastics GmbH was determined by characterizing and comparing the used powder after each cycle with material from previous cycles and with fresh powder. The melt flow index of Laser PP CP 75 was affected by recycling since it was observed to change by 30.62% after the 8th 100% re-use cycle, a lower value than PA 12 of 66.04%, for the 6th re-use cycle. Parts printed with virgin Laser PP CP 75 had an average dimensional error of 3.02% (virgin material) and 4.06% after the 4th 100% re-use cycle, which raises concerns about the commercial viability of the material. After the 4th re-use cycle, the printed parts had distorted edges and failed to print after the 9th print cycle. Lastly, tensile testing revealed a skewed bell-shaped curve of strength versus the number of recycles with the highest ultimate tensile strength occurring for the second 100% re-use cycle (7.4 MPa). The curves for elastic modulus and percentage elongation were inverted with minimum points for the 2nd 100% re-use cycle. Overall, the experimental work confirmed that the properties of polypropylene powder were affected by recycling in polymer laser sintering, but the powder exhibited superior characteristics upon recycling to those of the predominantly used PA 12 powder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.