Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2022
[Within-subject variability of the 6-minute walk test].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Six minute walk test: From normal to morbid obesity subject].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2023Article
- [Six minute walk test in young native high altitude residents].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The 6-minute walk test assesses the ability to perform exercise and it is widely used, of low cost, and of diverse variability. Objective: To define the usefulness of a second 6-minute walk test performed 30 minutes from the first. Material and methods. Material and methods: An observational, longitudinal and analytical study was carried out in subjects born and inhabitants from Mexico City, both genders, without cardiopulmonary disease. Their demographic variables were recorded. Differences were calculated with the t test for independent groups and variability with the Bland-Altman statistic; its magnitude, with the intraclass correlation coefficient and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 200 tests from 100 subjects were studied. Average age was 36 ± 11 years. Body mass index average was 24.71 ± 3.24 kg/m2. 43 subjects were male (43%). The most frequent activity was arts and crafts in 38 (38%). Only 55 subjects (55%) increased by 24 the number of meters walked in the second test. Total of meters walked on walk 1 vs. 2 were: 437.65 ± 48.84 vs. 441.62 ± 11.49. Mean difference (bias) was of -4 (57.9, -65.9) and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.800 (95% CI, 0.717-0.861). Conclusions: The 6-minute walk test is reproducible with wide variability. These results suggest to do only one 6-minute walk test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35267669PMC10396038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.