Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267657›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Advancements in Oncology with Artificial Intelligence-A Review Article.

Nikitha Vobugari, Vikranth Raja, Udhav Sethi, Kejal Gandhi, Kishore Raja, Salim R Surani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikitha VobugariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7622-0219
Vikranth RajaDepartment of Medicine, P.S.G Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore 641004, Tamil Nadu, India.
Udhav SethiSchool of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-5298
Kejal GandhiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Kishore RajaDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Salim R SuraniDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center · USPSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research · INTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-trained machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems can provide clinicians with therapeutic assistance, potentially increasing efficiency and improving efficacy. ML has demonstrated high accuracy in oncology-related diagnostic imaging, including screening mammography interpretation, colon polyp detection, glioma classification, and grading. By utilizing ML techniques, the manual steps of detecting and segmenting lesions are greatly reduced. ML-based tumor imaging analysis is independent of the experience level of evaluating physicians, and the results are expected to be more standardized and accurate. One of the biggest challenges is its generalizability worldwide. The current detection and screening methods for colon polyps and breast cancer have a vast amount of data, so they are ideal areas for studying the global standardization of artificial intelligence. Central nervous system cancers are rare and have poor prognoses based on current management standards. ML offers the prospect of unraveling undiscovered features from routinely acquired neuroimaging for improving treatment planning, prognostication, monitoring, and response assessment of CNS tumors such as gliomas. By studying AI in such rare cancer types, standard management methods may be improved by augmenting personalized/precision medicine. This review aims to provide clinicians and medical researchers with a basic understanding of how ML works and its role in oncology, especially in breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and primary and metastatic brain cancer. Understanding AI basics, current achievements, and future challenges are crucial in advancing the use of AI in oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrain tumorsbreast oncologycolon cancerconvolutional neural networksdeep learningmachine learningsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID35267657
PMCPMC8909088
OpenAlexW4220680585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.