Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267599›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Stacking Machine Learning Algorithms for Biomarker-Based Preoperative Diagnosis of a Pelvic Mass.

Reid Shaw, Anna E Lokshin, Michael C Miller, Geralyn Messerlian-Lambert, Richard G Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Pelvic Space-Occupying Lesions Via Rectal Endoscopic Ultrasound.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reid ShawDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6419-9635
Anna E LokshinHillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, PA 15219, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8171-220X
Michael C MillerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Geralyn Messerlian-LambertDepartment of Pathology, Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI 02905, USA.
Richard G MooreDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-5263
University of Rochester · USBrown University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Development of Novel Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers for Early Detection AlgorithmsR01CA247220 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAST, ROBERT C, LOKSHIN, ANNA E. · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
Urine and serum biomarkers for early diagnosis and risk assessment of pancreatic cancerR01CA254036 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., BRAND, RANDALL · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Development of an Assay for the Early Detection of Ovarian CancerR01CA136491 · NCI · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI MOORE, RICHARD G. · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NIH HHS R01CA247220-01NIH HHS R01CA254036NIH HHS RO1 CA136491-01NIH HHS U01CA15267-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the most predictive parameters of ovarian malignancy and develop a machine learning (ML) based algorithm to preoperatively distinguish between a benign and malignant pelvic mass.

methodsRetrospective study of 70 predictive parameters collected from 140 women with a pelvic mass. The women were split into a 3:1 "training" to "testing" dataset. Feature selection was performed using Gini impurity through an embedded random forest model and principal component analysis. Nine unique ML classifiers were assessed across a variety of model-specific hyperparameters using 25 bootstrap resamples of the training data. Model predictions were then combined into an ensemble stack by LASSO regression. The final ensemble stack and individual classifiers were then applied to the testing dataset to assess model performance.

resultsFeature selection identified HE4, CA125, and transferrin as three predictive parameters of malignancy. Assessment of the ensemble stack on the testing dataset outperformed all individual ML classifiers in predicting malignancy. The ensemble stack demonstrated an accuracy of 97.1%, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951, and a sensitivity of 93.3% with a specificity of 100%.

conclusionsCombining the measurement of three distinct biomarkers with the stacking of multiple ML classifiers into an ensemble can provide valuable preoperative diagnostic predictions for patients with a pelvic mass.

Indexed as

CA125HE4ovarian cancerpelvic mass

Identifiers

PMID35267599
PMCPMC8909341
OpenAlexW4214858538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.