ArticleCancers2022
Sting Is Commonly and Differentially Expressed in T- and Nk-Cell but Not B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- cGAS-STING signaling pathway as a therapeutic target in human diseases.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Natural Killer Cell-Mediated Antitumor Immunity: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.MedComm · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expression patterns of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) were investigated in a cohort of 158 T- and natural killer (NK)-cell and 265 B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), as well as in control reactive lymph nodes and tonsils. STING expression was assessed by immunohistochemical methods using diagnostic biopsy specimens obtained prior to treatment. Using an arbitrary 10% cutoff, STING was differentially expressed among T/NK-cell NHLs; positive in 36 out of 38 (95%) cases of ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 23 out of 37 (62%) ALK-ALCLs, 1 out of 13 (7.7%) angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphomas, 15 out of 19 (79%) peripheral T-cell lymphomas, not otherwise specified, 20 out of 36 (56%) extranodal NK/T-cell lymphomas of nasal type, 6 out of 7 (86%) T-cell lymphoblastic lymphomas, and 3 out of 4 (75%) mycosis fungoides. STING expression did not correlate with clinicopathological parameters or outcome in these patients with T/NK-cell lymphoma. By contrast, all 265 B-cell NHLs of various types were STING-negative. In addition, STING mRNA levels were very high in 6 out of 7 T-cell NHL cell lines, namely, ALK+ and ALK-ALCL cell lines, and very low or undetectable in 7 B-cell NHL cell lines, suggesting transcriptional downregulation of STING in neoplastic B-cells. At the protein level, using Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry performed on cell blocks, STING expression was found to be restricted to T-cell NHL cell lines. Taken together, STING expression represents a novel biomarker and therapeutic target in T- and NK-cell lymphomas with direct immunotherapeutic implications since modulators of cGAS-STING activity are already available for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.