ArticleCancers2022
Slow-Cycling Cells in Glioblastoma: A Specific Population in the Cellular Mosaic of Cancer Stem Cells.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Treatment Resistant Persister Cells Exploit Macrophage Lipid Metabolism to Sustain Glioblastoma Growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Vaccine-induced T cell receptor T cell therapy targeting a glioblastoma stemness antigen.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Impact of Metabolic Rewiring in Glioblastoma: The Immune Landscape and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Tumor-infiltrating immune cell signature score reveals prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Expanded specific T cells to hypomutated regions of the SARS-CoV-2 using mRNA electroporated antigen-presenting cells.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Article
- Thinking (Metastasis) outside the (Primary Tumor) Box.Cancers · 2023Article
- Distinct Lineage of Slow-Cycling Cells Amidst the Prevailing Heterogeneity in Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Zeta 1 as a Potential Target in Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Glioblastoma and Methionine Addiction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells in the context of the immune microenvironment and geospatial organization.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) exhibits populations of cells that drive tumorigenesis, treatment resistance, and disease progression. Cells with such properties have been described to express specific surface and intracellular markers or exhibit specific functional states, including being slow-cycling or quiescent with the ability to generate proliferative progenies. In GBM, each of these cellular fractions was shown to harbor cardinal features of cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this study, we focus on the comparison of these cells and present evidence of great phenotypic and functional heterogeneity in brain cancer cell populations with stemness properties, especially between slow-cycling cells (SCCs) and cells phenotypically defined based on the expression of markers commonly used to enrich for CSCs. Here, we present an integrative analysis of the heterogeneity present in GBM cancer stem cell populations using a combination of approaches including flow cytometry, bulk RNA sequencing, and single cell transcriptomics completed with functional assays. We demonstrated that SCCs exhibit a diverse range of expression levels of canonical CSC markers. Importantly, the property of being slow-cycling and the expression of these markers were not mutually inclusive. We interrogated a single-cell RNA sequencing dataset and defined a group of cells as SCCs based on the highest score of a specific metabolic signature. Multiple CSC groups were determined based on the highest expression level of CD133, SOX2, PTPRZ1, ITGB8, or CD44. Each group, composed of 22 cells, showed limited cellular overlap, with SCCs representing a unique population with none of the 22 cells being included in the other groups. We also found transcriptomic distinctions between populations, which correlated with clinicopathological features of GBM. Patients with strong SCC signature score were associated with shorter survival and clustered within the mesenchymal molecular subtype. Cellular diversity amongst these populations was also demonstrated functionally, as illustrated by the heterogenous response to the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide. In conclusion, our study supports the cancer stem cell mosaicism model, with slow-cycling cells representing critical elements harboring key features of disseminating cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.