Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267431›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

What Defines Quality of Life for Older Patients Diagnosed with Cancer? A Qualitative Study.

Petronella A L Nelleke Seghers, Jolina A Kregting, Lieke H van Huis-Tanja, Pierre Soubeyran, Shane O'Hanlon, Siri Rostoft, Marije E Hamaker, Johanneke E A Portielje

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next?Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Petronella A L Nelleke SeghersDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-8525
Jolina A KregtingDepartment of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-4123
Lieke H van Huis-TanjaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pierre SoubeyranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-7299
Shane O'HanlonDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9270-2768
Siri RostoftDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Marije E HamakerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johanneke E A PortieljeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center-LUMC, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Diakonessenhuis hospital · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLOslo University Hospital · NOUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

European Union Horizon 2020, No. 945218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of cancer can have a significant impact on quality of life in older patients and this needs to be taken into account in decision making. However, quality of life can consist of many different components with varying importance between individuals. We set out to assess how older patients with cancer define quality of life and the components that are most significant to them. This was a single-centre, qualitative interview study. Patients aged 70 years or older with cancer were asked to answer open-ended questions: What makes life worthwhile? What does quality of life mean to you? What could affect your quality of life? Subsequently, they were asked to choose the five most important determinants of quality of life from a predefined list: cognition, contact with family or with community, independence, staying in your own home, helping others, having enough energy, emotional well-being, life satisfaction, religion and leisure activities. Afterwards, answers to the open-ended questions were independently categorized by two authors. The proportion of patients mentioning each category in the open-ended questions were compared to the predefined questions. Overall, 63 patients (median age 76 years) were included. When asked, "What makes life worthwhile?", patients identified social functioning (86%) most frequently. Moreover, to define quality of life, patients most frequently mentioned categories in the domains of physical functioning (70%) and physical health (48%). Maintaining cognition was mentioned in 17% of the open-ended questions and it was the most commonly chosen option from the list of determinants (72% of respondents). In conclusion, physical functioning, social functioning, physical health and cognition are important components in quality of life. When discussing treatment options, the impact of treatment on these aspects should be taken into consideration.

Indexed as

cancergeriatric oncologyolder patientsquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35267431
PMCPMC8909907
OpenAlexW4213062966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.