Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267337›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Sausages Made with Grasshopper (

Salvador O Cruz-López, Yenizey M Álvarez-Cisneros, Julieta Domínguez-Soberanes, Héctor B Escalona-Buendía, Claudia N Sánchez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential of Cricket (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization of Cooked Meat Models using Grasshopper (Food science of animal resources · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salvador O Cruz-LópezDepartamento de Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Av. Ferrocarril de San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1a. Sección, Alcaldía Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México 09310, Mexico.
Yenizey M Álvarez-CisnerosDepartamento de Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Av. Ferrocarril de San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1a. Sección, Alcaldía Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México 09310, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-4249
Julieta Domínguez-SoberanesEscuela de Dirección de Negocios Alimentarios, Universidad Panamericana, Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer 101, Aguascalientes 20296, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-3352
Héctor B Escalona-BuendíaDepartamento de Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Iztapalapa, Av. Ferrocarril de San Rafael Atlixco 186, Col. Leyes de Reforma 1a. Sección, Alcaldía Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México 09310, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9125-5428
Claudia N SánchezFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Josemaría Escrivá de Balaguer 101, Aguascalientes 20296, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6316-5214
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MXUniversidad Panamericana · MX

Funding

Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Divisional-CBS-UAM-I Project "14505018".
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects are currently of interest due to their high nutritional value, in particular for the high concentration of quality protein. Moreover, it can also be used as an extender or binder in meat products. The objective was to evaluate grasshopper flour (GF) as a partial or total replacement for potato starch to increase the protein content of sausages and achieve good acceptability by consumers. GF has 48% moisture, 6.7% fat and 45% total protein. Sausages were analyzed by NIR and formulations with GF in all concentrations (10, 7, 5 and 3%) combined with starch (3, 5 and 7%) increased protein content. Results obtained for the sausages formulations with grasshoppers showed an increase in hardness, springiness, gumminess and chewiness through a Texture-Profile-Analysis. Moreover, a* and b* are similar to the control, but L* decreased. The check-all-that-apply test showed the attributes highlighted for sausages with GF possessed herbal flavor, brown color, and granular texture. The liking-product-landscape map showed that the incorporation of 7 and 10% of GF had an overall liking of 3.2 and 3.3, respectively, considered as "do not like much". GF can be used as a binder in meat products up to 10% substitution. However, it is important to improve the overall liking of the sausage.

Indexed as

edible insectsgrasshoppernon-meat ingredientsproteinsausagesstarch chewy

Identifiers

PMID35267337
PMCPMC8909260
OpenAlexW4214653208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.