Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267281›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Nutritional Benefits from Fatty Acids in Organic and Grass-Fed Beef.

Hannah Davis, Amelia Magistrali, Gillian Butler, Sokratis Stergiadis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06489886 (Nutrient and Hormonal Profile and Muscle Protein Synthesis Response to Consuming Chicken Grown Using Different Farming Practices), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06489886 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Nutrient and Hormonal Profile and Muscle Protein Synthesis Response to Consuming Chicken Grown Using Different Farming Practices

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2024 to 2026Enrolled19ConditionsEffect of FoodArmsConventional Chicken, Regenerative Chicken
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah DavisSchool of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-1937
Amelia MagistraliSchool of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2406-7985
Gillian ButlerSchool of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Sokratis StergiadisDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-182X
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Livestock production is under increasing scrutiny as a component of the food supply chain with a large impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Amidst growing calls to reduce industrial ruminant production, there is room to consider differences in meat quality and nutritional benefits of organic and/or pasture-based management systems. Access to forage, whether fresh or conserved, is a key influencing factor for meat fatty acid profile, and there is increasing evidence that pasture access is particularly beneficial for meat’s nutritional quality. These composition differences ultimately impact nutrient supply to consumers of conventional, organic and grass-fed meat. For this review, predicted fatty acid supply from three consumption scenarios were modelled: i. average UK population National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) (<128 g/week) red meat consumption, ii. red meat consumption suggested by the UK National Health Service (NHS) (<490 g/week) and iii. red meat consumption suggested by the Eat Lancet Report (<98 g/week). The results indicate average consumers would receive more of the beneficial fatty acids for human health (especially the essential omega-3, alpha-linolenic acid) from pasture-fed beef, produced either organically or conventionally.

Indexed as

conventionalfatty acidsnutritional qualityorganicpasture-fedruminant nutrition

Identifiers

PMID35267281
PMCPMC8909876
OpenAlexW4213287954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.