ReviewJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2022
A comprehensive review on methods for promotion of mechanical features and biodegradation rate in amniotic membrane scaffolds.
Review in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation Optimizes Neurotrophic and Neuroimmune Signaling in Bisvinyl Sulfonemethyl-Based Nerve Guidance Conduits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- UV-Crosslinked Collagen and Gelatin Sheets as Cell Scaffold Materials: Nanoscale Surface Properties and Cell Proliferation Performance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Potential of human amniotic membrane application for articular cartilage regeneration: a review.Cell and tissue banking · 2025Review
- Implantable Dental Barrier Membranes as Regenerative Medicine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- A hybrid scaffold of modified human amniotic membrane with gelatine/dendrimer-protected silver nanoparticles for skin wound healing applications.RSC advances · 2025Article
- In vitro and in vivo assessment of a new acellular human amnion/chorion membrane device for guided bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomaterials for Corneal Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Viewing Decellularized Amniotic Membrane Through the Lens of Coupled Scaffolding and Drug Delivery Systems in Regenerative Medicine.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Bilateral Crosslinking with Glutaraldehyde and 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl) Carbodiimide: An Optimization Strategy for the Application of Decellularized Human Amniotic Membrane in Tissue Engineering.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- Amniotic membrane, a novel bioscaffold in cardiac diseases: from mechanism to applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- The Preparation and Clinical Efficacy of Amnion-Derived Membranes: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Modification of the Human Amniotic Membrane Using Different Cross-Linking Agents as a Promising Tool for Regenerative Medicine.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Emerging Strategies for the Biofabrication of Multilayer Composite Amniotic Membranes for Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Biodegradability of Amniotic Membrane as Potential Scaffold for Periodontal Regeneration.Cureus · 2023Article
- Epiretinal Amniotic Membrane Influences the Cellular Behavior of Profibrotic Dedifferentiated Cells of Proliferative VitreoretinopathyJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amniotic membrane (AM) is a biological tissue that surrounds the fetus in the mother's womb. It has pluripotent cells, immune modulators, collagen, cytokines with anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory effect, matrix proteins, and growth factors. In spite of the biological characteristics, some results have been released in preventing the adhesion on traumatized surfaces. Application of the AM as a scaffold is limited due to its low biomechanical resistance and rapid biodegradation. Therefore, for using the AM during surgery, its modification by different methods such as cross-linking of the membrane collagen is necessary, because the cross-linking is an effective way to reduce the rate of biodegradation of the biological materials. In addition, their cross-linking is likely an efficient way to increase the tensile properties of the material, so that they can be easily handled or sutured. In this regard, various methods related to cross-linking of the AM subsuming the composite materials, physical cross-linking, and chemical cross-linking with the glutraldehyde, carbodiimide, genipin, aluminum sulfate, etc. are reviewed along with its advantages and disadvantages in the current work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.