ReviewLung2022
Proposed Pathogenesis of Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage in Idiopathic Pulmonary Hemosiderosis.
Review in Lung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral Lung Transplantation for Lymphangioleiomyomatosis With Secondary Pulmonary Hemosiderosis: A Case Report.Case reports in pathology · 2026Article
- [Clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary immune thrombocytopenia complicated with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis: A pediatric case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2025Article
- Diabetic Pneumopathy- A Novel Diabetes-associated Complication: Pathophysiology, the Underlying Mechanism and Combination Medication.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage in children: an international multicentre study.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- LUNG Year in Review: 2022.Lung · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis (IPH) is a rare disease that causes diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). The latest data suggests an immunologic origin of IPH, and a new name, immune mediated pulmonary hemosiderosis (ImPH), has been proposed. However, the exact immunologic mechanism has remained elusive for nearly eight decades despite extensive research, including detailed histopathologic analysis. Although several hypotheses have been proposed to describe the pathobiology of IPH, none of them explain the clinical and histopathologic findings conclusively. In this manuscript, we have presented a new hypothesis for the pathogenesis of DAH in IPH. We hypothesize that DAH in IPH is not immunocomplex mediated but due to histamine, eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), and possibly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). These bioactive proteins induce endothelial and alveolar epithelial damage, leading to the peri-capillary and intraalveolar escape of RBCs. The deformability of the RBC likely also plays a role. The supranormal secretion of histamine, ECP and VEGF occurs in genetically predisposed individuals with an aberrant immunologic response. The histamine is released from the basophils and possibly the mast cells in response to cytokines secreted by activated lymphocytes. The lymphocyte activation occurs after exposure to a known (gluten) or unknown antigen. The same lymphocyte-derived cytokines also induce eosinophilic degranulation of ECP and VEGF in the pulmonary circulation. We believe that our hypothesis unifies the observed clinical variabilities and histopathologic findings in IPH, and we hope that would promote future research in the field of IPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.