Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35267022›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2022

The Future of Burn Care From a Complexity Science Perspective.

Paul P M van Zuijlen, Halil Ibrahim Korkmaz, Vivek M Sheraton, Tsjitske M Haanstra, Anouk Pijpe, Annebeth de Vries, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Eelke Bosma, Evelien de Jong, Esther Middelkoop and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Working Towards Holistic Scar Assessment and Improved Shared Decision Making in Global Burn Care.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Paul P M van ZuijlenBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-8848
Halil Ibrahim KorkmazBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Vivek M SheratonInstitute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tsjitske M HaanstraNational Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut, Nederland), Diemen, the Netherlands.
Anouk PijpeBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Annebeth de VriesBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Cornelis H van der VliesBurn Centre and Department of Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eelke BosmaBurn Centre and Department of Surgery, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Evelien de JongBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Esther MiddelkoopBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Fred J VermolenDelft Institute of Applied Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.
Peter M A SlootInstitute for Advanced Study, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Association of Dutch Burn Centres · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLHasselt University · BEMartini Ziekenhuis · NLNanyang Technological University · SGNetherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences · NLRed Cross Hospital · GRZorginstituut Nederland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health care is undergoing a profound technological and digital transformation and has become increasingly complex. It is important for burns professionals and researchers to adapt to these developments which may require new ways of thinking and subsequent new strategies. As Einstein has put it: "We must learn to see the world anew." The relatively new scientific discipline "Complexity science" can give more direction to this and is the metaphorical open door that should not go unnoticed in view of the burn care of the future. Complexity science studies "why the whole is more than the sum of the parts." It studies how multiple separate components interact with each other and their environment and how these interactions lead to "behavior of the system." Biological systems are always part of smaller and larger systems and exhibit the behavior of adaptivity, hence the name complex adaptive systems. From the perspective of complexity science, a severe burn injury is an extreme disruption of the "human body system." But this disruption also applies to the systems at the organ and cellular levels. All these systems follow the principles of complex systems. Awareness of the scaling process at multilevel helps to understand and manage the complex situation when dealing with severe burn cases. This paper aims to create awareness of the concept of complexity and to demonstrate the value and possibilities of complexity science methods and tools for the future of burn care through examples from preclinical, clinical, and organizational perspectives in burn care.

Indexed as

BurnsDelivery of Health CareHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID35267022
PMCPMC9629443
OpenAlexW4220964372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.