Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266872›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

RWD-Cockpit: Application for Quality Assessment of Real-world Data.

Lmar Marie Babrak, Erand Smakaj, Teyfik Agac, Petra Maria Asprion, Frank Grimberg, Daan Van der Werf, Erwin Willem van Ginkel, Deniz David Tosoni, Ieuan Clay, Markus Degen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lmar Marie Babrak *University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-4825
Erand Smakaj *University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0596-1735
Teyfik AgacUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-4767
Petra Maria AsprionFachhochschule Nordwestschweiz University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Business, Olten, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-5087
Frank GrimbergFachhochschule Nordwestschweiz University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Business, Olten, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-089X
Daan Van der WerfQ-Strip, Steenbergen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-8084
Erwin Willem van GinkelQ-Strip, Steenbergen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-6706
Deniz David TosoniUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-1544
Ieuan ClayEvidation Health Inc, San Mateo, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-8834
Markus DegenUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7009-782X
Dominique BrodbeckUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-5828
Eriberto Noel NataliUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9100-807X
Erik SchkommodauUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-2515
Enkelejda Miho *University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, School of Life Sciences, Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6461-0519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital technologies are transforming the health care system. A large part of information is generated as real-world data (RWD). Data from electronic health records and digital biomarkers have the potential to reveal associations between the benefits and adverse events of medicines, establish new patient-stratification principles, expose unknown disease correlations, and inform on preventive measures. The impact for health care payers and providers, the biopharmaceutical industry, and governments is massive in terms of health outcomes, quality of care, and cost. However, a framework to assess the preliminary quality of RWD is missing, thus hindering the conduct of population-based observational studies to support regulatory decision-making and real-world evidence.

objectiveTo address the need to qualify RWD, we aimed to build a web application as a tool to translate characterization of some quality parameters of RWD into a metric and propose a standard framework for evaluating the quality of the RWD.

methodsThe RWD-Cockpit systematically scores data sets based on proposed quality metrics and customizable variables chosen by the user. Sleep RWD generated de novo and publicly available data sets were used to validate the usability and applicability of the web application. The RWD quality score is based on the evaluation of 7 variables: manageability specifies access and publication status; complexity defines univariate, multivariate, and longitudinal data; sample size indicates the size of the sample or samples; privacy and liability stipulates privacy rules; accessibility specifies how the data set can be accessed and to what granularity; periodicity specifies how often the data set is updated; and standardization specifies whether the data set adheres to any specific technical or metadata standard. These variables are associated with several descriptors that define specific characteristics of the data set.

resultsTo address the need to qualify RWD, we built the RWD-Cockpit web application, which proposes a framework and applies a common standard for a preliminary evaluation of RWD quality across data sets-molecular, phenotypical, and social-and proposes a standard that can be further personalized by the community retaining an internal standard. Applied to 2 different case studies-de novo-generated sleep data and publicly available data sets-the RWD-Cockpit could identify and provide researchers with variables that might increase quality.

conclusionsThe results from the application of the framework of RWD metrics implemented in the RWD-Cockpit application suggests that multiple data sets can be preliminarily evaluated in terms of quality using the proposed metrics. The output scores-quality identifiers-provide a first quality assessment for the use of RWD. Although extensive challenges remain to be addressed to set RWD quality standards, our proposal can serve as an initial blueprint for community efforts in the characterization of RWD quality for regulated settings.

Indexed as

applicationmobile phonequality assessmentreal-world datareal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID35266872
PMCPMC9627468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.