Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266815›Full record

ArticlemBio2022

Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Variants B.1.617.1 (Kappa), B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.618 by Cell Entry and Immune Evasion.

Wenlin Ren, Xiaohui Ju, Mingli Gong, Jun Lan, Yanying Yu, Quanxin Long, Devin J Kenney, Aoife K O'Connell, Yu Zhang, Jin Zhong and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A perspective on SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles vaccines.International immunopharmacology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenlin Ren *Center for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Xiaohui Ju *Center for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Mingli Gong *Center for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Jun Lan *School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Yanying Yu *Center for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Quanxin LongKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology on Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Education, Chongqing Medical Universitygrid.203458.8, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1857-2798
Devin J KenneyDepartment of Microbiology, Boston Universitygrid.189504.1 School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aoife K O'ConnellDepartment of Microbiology, Boston Universitygrid.189504.1 School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yu ZhangCenter for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Jin ZhongUnit of Viral Hepatitis, CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Institut Pasteur of Shanghai, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3554-1275
Guocai ZhongShenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7609-9575
Florian DouamDepartment of Microbiology, Boston Universitygrid.189504.1 School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xinquan WangSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.
Ailong HuangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology on Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Education, Chongqing Medical Universitygrid.203458.8, Chongqing, China.
Rong ZhangKey Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology (MOE/NHC/CAMS), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang DingCenter for Infectious Disease Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Universitygrid.12527.33, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6226-869X
Tsinghua University · CNBoston University · USChongqing Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNPeking University · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

Advanced Customer Cultivation Project of Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, CAS 2021ACCP-MS03Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation M21001National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 32070153Start-up Foundation of Tsinghua University 53332101319Tsinghua University Spring Breeze Fund 2021Z99CFY030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, highly transmissible severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants B.1.617.1 (Kappa), B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.618 with mutations within the spike proteins were identified in India. The spike protein of Kappa contains the four mutations E154K, L452R, E484Q, and P681R, and Delta contains L452R, T478K, and P681R, while B.1.618 spike harbors mutations Δ145-146 and E484K. However, it remains unknown whether these variants have alterations in their entry efficiency, host tropism, and sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies as well as entry inhibitors. In this study, we found that Kappa, Delta, or B.1.618 spike uses human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with no or slightly increased efficiency, while it gains a significantly increased binding affinity with mouse, marmoset, and koala ACE2 orthologs, which exhibit limited binding with wild-type (WT) spike. Furthermore, the P681R mutation leads to enhanced spike cleavage, which could facilitate viral entry. In addition, Kappa, Delta, and B.1.618 exhibit a reduced sensitivity to neutralization by convalescent-phase sera due to the mutation E484Q, T478K, Δ145-146, or E484K, but remain sensitive to entry inhibitors such as ACE2-Ig decoy receptor. Collectively, our study revealed that enhanced human and mouse ACE2 receptor engagement, increased spike cleavage, and reduced sensitivity to neutralization antibodies of Kappa, Delta and B.1.618 may contribute to the rapid spread of these variants. Furthermore, our results also highlight that ACE2-Ig could be developed as a broad-spectrum antiviral strategy against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmune EvasionImmunization, PassiveMiceSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVirus InternalizationAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antiviral AgentsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2 decoy receptorB.1.618COVID-19Delta variantKappa variantSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35266815
PMCPMC9040861
OpenAlexW4220718818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.