Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266610›Full record

ReviewPaediatric anaesthesia2022

Impact of surgery and anesthesia during early brain development: A perfect storm.

Kristin Keunen, Nicolaas H Sperna Weiland, Bernadette S de Bakker, Linda S de Vries, Markus F Stevens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. ERNICA evidence based guideline on omphalocele.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hirschsprung disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Anesthesia and neurodevelopment after 20 years: where are we now and where to next?Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristin KeunenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4856-5516
Nicolaas H Sperna WeilandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernadette S de BakkerDepartment of Medical Biology Section Clinical Anatomy & Embryology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda S de VriesDepartment of Neonatology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Markus F StevensDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal surgery and concomitant anesthesia coincide with a timeframe of rapid brain development. The speed and complexity of early brain development superimposed on immature regulatory mechanisms that include incomplete cerebral autoregulation, insufficient free radical scavenging and an immature immune response puts the brain at risk. Brain injury may have long-term consequences for multiple functional domains including cognition, learning skills, and behavior. Neurodevelopmental follow-up studies have noted mild-to-moderate deficits in children who underwent major neonatal surgery and related anesthesia. The present review evaluates neonatal surgery against the background of neurobiological processes that unfold at a pace unparalleled by any other period of human brain development. First, a structured summary of early brain development is provided in order to establish theoretical groundwork. Next, literature on brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal surgery is discussed. Special attention is given to recent findings of structural brain damage reported after neonatal surgery. Notably, high-quality imaging data acquired before surgery are currently lacking. Third, mechanisms of injury are interrogated taking the perspective of early brain development into account. We propose a novel disease model that constitutes a triad of inflammation, vascular immaturity, and neurotoxicity of prolonged exposure to anesthetic drugs. With each of these components exacerbating the other, this amalgam incites the perfect storm, resulting in brain injury. When examining the brain, it seems intuitive to distinguish between neonates (i.e., <60 postconceptional weeks) and more mature infants, multiple and/or prolonged anesthesia exposure and single, short surgery. This review culminates in an outline of anesthetic considerations and future directions that we believe will help move the field forward.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnestheticsBrain InjuriesNeurotoxicity SyndromesBrainChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAnestheticsanesthesiabrain developmentbrain injurycerebral autoregulationneonatal surgeryneurotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35266610
PMCPMC9311405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.