Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266552›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2022

Baseline assessment findings of the Africa Society for Blood Transfusion Step-Wise Accreditation Programme in 10 sub-Saharan African countries, 2016-2018.

Udhayashankar Kanagasabai, Michael Qualls, Ray W Shiraishi, Laura Eno, Innocent Zungu, Lesley Bust, Bakary Drammeh, Dejana Selenic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Udhayashankar KanagasabaiEpidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, CGH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-9344
Michael QuallsDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, CGH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ray W ShiraishiDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, CGH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Laura EnoDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Innocent ZunguDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lesley BustWestern Province Blood Transfusion Service, Cape Town, South Africa.
Bakary DrammehDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, CGH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Dejana SelenicDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, CGH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · UGSouth African National Blood Service · ZA

Funding

U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief GH001565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe accreditation of blood services promotes continuous quality improvement in blood and transfusion services. The Africa Society for Blood Transfusion (AfSBT) conducted 20 baseline assessments of National Blood Transfusion Services (NBTS) or blood banks as part of the Step-Wise Accreditation Programme (SWAP) in 10 sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries from 2016 to 2018. This paper aims to elucidate the process and findings of the baseline assessments. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a descriptive study of 20 baseline assessments of NBTS. Eleven sections of the AfSBT assessment were reviewed, and 48 out of 68 standards and 356 out of 466 criteria were assessed. Each standard was assigned a value of 1 if it was fully achieved, 0.5 if partially achieved and 0 if not achieved. We defined average section scores >75% as having 'met AfSBT Standards', ≤25% as not meeting standards, 26%-50% as needs major improvement, and 51%-75% as needs some improvement and >75% as meets standards.

resultsThe AfSBT SWAP standards were met in 4 out of the 11 sections: donor management, blood collection, component production and compatibility testing. Three sections were determined to need some improvement (quality system; handling, transport and storage and testing of donated blood), and three sections were determined to need major improvement (haemovigilance, blood administration and national blood service accreditation). One section (receipt, ordering, and issuing of blood) did not meet standards.

conclusionDespite improvements in the quality of blood services in SSA over the past two decades, governments may consider the importance of prioritizing investments in NBTS, ensuring these institutions meet international accreditation standards that are aligned with safe blood transfusion services.

Indexed as

AccreditationBlood TransfusionAfrica South of the SaharaBlood BanksBlood SafetyHumansaccreditationAfSBTblood transfusion systems

Identifiers

PMID35266552
PMCPMC9314842
OpenAlexW4221102162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.