Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266379›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2022

The etiology of adnexal masses in women with a history of non-gynaecological malignancy: recurrence, second, primary or none?

Harika Yumru Çeliksoy, Hamdullah Sözen, Merve Baktıroğlu, Samet Topuz, Yavuz Salihoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harika Yumru ÇeliksoyDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, İstanbul University-İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-8936-5211
Hamdullah SözenDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, İstanbul University-İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1894-1688
Merve BaktıroğluDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, İstanbul University-İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8931-8397
Samet TopuzDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, İstanbul University-İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9069-0185
Yavuz SalihoğluDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, İstanbul University-İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-1097-0727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The occurrence of adnexal masses in patients with a history of non-gynaecological malignancy (NGM) raises concerns for malignancy, either primary or metastasis. Subsequent treatment and prognosis depends on the etiology. Our aim was to investigate the characteristics and results of the patients with suspicious adnexal masses, who had a history of NGM. Material and Methods: The records of 61 patients with a history of NGM were analyzed, who were operated for an adnexal mass. Complex adnexal masses were included in the analysis while simple cysts were excluded. Results: The most common NGM origins were gastrointestinal (gastric and colorectal) tract and breast. Of all adnexal masses, four were benign (6.5%), 22 were primary ovarian malignancy (36.1%) and 35 were metastasis (57.4%). Two of the 22 primary cases were borderline ovarian tumor. Among the characteristics of primary and metastatic groups, laterality in pathology results and serum CA125 levels were statistically different (p<0.05). Among the patients with history of gastrointestinal cancers, the percentage of ovarian metastasis was 81%. Primary ovarian malignancy was most frequently (64%) observed among the patients with history of breast cancers. Conclusion: For patients with a history of gastrointestinal cancer, recurrence of the cancer in the form of ovarian metastasis was more likely, rather than a second primary cancer. The risk of primary ovarian cancer (POC) was remarkable in those with history of a breast cancer. A multidisciplinary strategy, including a gynaecological oncologist, plays an important role in managing these cases, regardless of whether or not it is a POC.

Indexed as

Krukenberg tumormetastasisOvarian neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35266379
PMCPMC9743350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.