SynthesisClinical cardiology2022
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for octogenarians: A meta-analysis involving 146 372 patients.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07118930 (Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study of Sivelestat Sodium in the Perioperative Management of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Double-Blind Controlled Study of Sivelestat Sodium in the Perioperative Management of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for octogenarians: A meta-analysis involving 146 372 patients.Clinical cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Trial
- Article
- A 27-Year Comparative Analysis of Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Octogenarians.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2026Article
- Survival and Mid-Term Outcomes of On Pump vs. Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in A First Peruvian Registry.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2024Observational
- Comparison of outcomes between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery using collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is an ongoing debate concerning the optimal surgical option of myocardial revascularization for octogenarians. The current meta-analysis aimed to compare clinical outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) or conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCABG) in octogenarians. PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify eligible studies from inception to March 2021. The analysis was performed using STATA 15.1. A literature search yielded 18 retrospective studies involving 146 372 patients (OPCABG = 44 522 vs. CCABG = 101 850). Pooled analysis showed a strong trend toward reducing mortality risk in the OPCABG group (odds ratio: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-1.00, p = .05). However, it did not reach statistical significance. The sensitive analysis demonstrated that OPCABG was less likely to cause death than CCABG. There were comparable data in myocardial infarction, renal failure, deep sternal wound infection, and hospital stays between the two groups, although the incidence of stroke, atrial fibrillation, prolonged ventilation, and reoperation for bleeding was significantly lower in the OPCAGB group. OPCABG may be an effective surgical strategy for myocardial revascularization, especially in reducing the incidence of postoperative stroke, atrial fibrillation, prolonged ventilation, and reoperation for bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.