Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266148›Full record

Trial reportAllergy2022

Oral desensitization therapy for peanut allergy induces dynamic changes in peanut-specific immune responses.

Veronique Bajzik, Hannah A DeBerg, Nahir Garabatos, Blake J Rust, Kimberly K Obrien, Quynh-Anh Nguyen, Colin O'Rourke, Alex Smith, Alex H Walker, Charlie Quinn and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06554691 (Exploring the Immunological Basis in the Evolution of Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy During Treatment Care for Understanding Markers and Treatment Targets), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06554691 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Exploring the Immunological Basis in the Evolution of Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy During Treatment Care for Understanding Markers and Treatment Targets

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorLuxembourg Institute of HealthRan2023 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsFood Allergy, Food Allergy in Children, Food Allergy Peanut, Tree Nut Allergies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. HLA-DRAllergy · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Diverging in Vivo Immune Response Patterns After Oral Food Challenge in Peanut Allergic Adults.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Irradiation does not impact the immunogenicity of food flours used for oral immunotherapy.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a pediatric immune cell atlas and characterization of CD4+ T cells in food allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Veronique BajzikBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Hannah A DeBergBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nahir GarabatosBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Blake J RustBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-0990
Kimberly K ObrienBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Quynh-Anh NguyenBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Colin O'RourkeBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alex SmithAimmune Therapeutics, Brisbane, California, USA.
Alex H WalkerBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Charlie QuinnBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Vivian H GersukBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mary FarringtonVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David JeongVirginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brian P VickeryEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Daniel C AdelmanUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0470-3235
Erik WambreBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-0011
Virginia Mason Medical Center · USDecImmune Therapeutics (United States) · USEmory University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Project-002U19AI135817 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI KWOK, WILLIAM W. · 2018 to 2022
$6.8M
Induction and signature of pathogenic T cells in allergyR01AI108839 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI WAMBRE, ERIK · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108839NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PALISADE study, an international, phase 3 trial of peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) with AR101, resulted in desensitization in children and adolescents who were highly allergic to peanut. An improved understanding of the immune mechanism induced in response to food allergen immunotherapy would enable more informed and effective therapeutic strategies. Our main purpose was to examine the immunological changes in blood samples from a subset of peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral desensitization immunotherapy with AR101.

methodsBlood samples obtained as part of enrollment screening and at multiple time points during PALISADE study were used to assess basophil and CD4+ T-cell reactivity to peanut.

resultsThe absence of clinical reactivity to the entry double-blinded placebo-controlled peanut challenge (DBPCFC) was accompanied by a significantly lower basophil sensitivity and T-cell reactivity to peanut compared with DBPCFC reactors. At baseline, peanut-reactive TH2A cells were observed in many but not all peanut-allergic patients and their level in peripheral blood correlates with T-cell reactivity to peanut and with serum peanut-specific IgE and IgG4 levels. POIT reshaped circulating peanut-reactive T-cell responses in a subset-dependent manner. Changes in basophil and T-cell responses to peanut closely paralleled clinical benefits to AR101 therapy and resemble responses in those with lower clinical sensitivity to peanut. However, no difference in peanut-reactive Treg cell frequency was observed between groups.

conclusionOral desensitization therapy with AR101 leads to decreased basophil sensitivity to peanut and reshapes peanut-reactive T effector cell responses supporting its potential as an immunomodulatory therapy.

Indexed as

Peanut HypersensitivityAdministration, OralAdolescentAllergensArachisChildDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansImmunityAllergensbasophilsCD4+ T cellsoral immunotherapypeanut allergyTh2A cells

Identifiers

PMID35266148
PMCPMC9356972
OpenAlexW4220870254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.