ArticleUpdates in surgery2022
Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A radiomics-clinical predictive model for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on preoperative CT imaging: a retrospective single center study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Article
- [The clinical importance of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
TG18 recommends bailout surgery (BOS) for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there is not a clear criterion on the decision process on whether to continue laparoscopic BOS or open BOS, and optimal procedure for treatment for the remnant cystic bile duct also awaits discussion. We comparted with open BOS and laparoscopic BOS, and compared with suture close and clipping or ligating of remnant cystic duct. We have accrued 57 patients underwent BOS during study period. Seventeen cases underwent laparoscopic BOS, and 38 cases underwent open BOS. There were 22 patients were accrued in suture closing and 35 patients were accrued in clipping or ligating. Open BOS experienced high levels of CRP, WBC, NLR, and CAR, and was associated with significantly longer hospitalization, operating time, and amount of bleeding. Suture close was higher in patients with preoperative endoscopic lithotripsy (EL). BOS can be sufficiently performed under laparoscopy. Patients underwent preoperative EL tended to be higher necessity to suture close of cystic duct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.