Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266056›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Response of three local chicken ecotypes of Ghana to lentogenic and velogenic Newcastle disease virus challenge.

Christopher K Tudeka, George K Aning, Augustine Naazie, Princess K Botchway, Esinam N Amuzu-Aweh, Godwin K Agbenyegah, Ben Enyetornye, Diana Fiadzomor, Perot Saelao, Ying Wang and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher K TudekaDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
George K AningFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Augustine NaazieDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Princess K BotchwayDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Esinam N Amuzu-AwehDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Godwin K AgbenyegahDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Ben EnyetornyeDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Diana FiadzomorDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Perot SaelaoFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ying WangFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Terra R KellyFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Rodrigo GallardoFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Jack C M DekkersFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Susan J LamontFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Huaijun ZhouFeed the Future Innovation Lab for Genomics To Improve Poultry, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Boniface B KayangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 226, Legon, Accra, Ghana. bbkayang@ug.edu.gh.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Ghana · GHInstitute for the Future · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess the response of three Ghanaian local chicken ecotypes to LaSota (lentogenic) and virulent field strains of Newcastle disease virus (NDV). Local chickens sampled from the Interior Savannah (IS), Forest (FO) and Coastal Savannah (CS) agro-ecological zones were bred and their offspring were challenged with LaSota NDV at 4 weeks of age. The LaSota challenge was replicated four times with different chicken groups. A total of 1438 chicks comprising 509 Coastal Savannah, 518 Forest and 411 Interior Savannah ecotypes were used. Pre- and post-challenge anti-NDV antibody titre levels were determined via ELISA assays. A second trial was conducted by introducing sick birds infected with virulent NDV to a flock of immunologically naïve chickens at 4 weeks old. Body weights were measured pre- and post-infection. Sex of the chickens was determined using a molecular method. In both trials, there was no significant difference among ecotypes in body weight and growth rate. In the LaSota trial, anti-NDV antibody titre did not differ by ecotype or sex. However, there was a positive linear relationship between body weight and antibody titre. In the velogenic NDV trial, survivability and lesion scores were similar among the three ecotypes. This study confirms that a relatively high dose of LaSota (NDV) challenge has no undesirable effect on Ghanaian local chicken ecotypes. All three Ghanaian local chicken ecotypes were susceptible to velogenic NDV challenge. Resistance to NDV by Ghanaian local chickens appears to be determined more by the individual's genetic makeup than by their ecotype.

Indexed as

Newcastle DiseasePoultry DiseasesViral VaccinesAnimalsChickensEcotypeGhanaNewcastle disease virusViral VaccinesAntibody titreLesion scoreNewcastle disease virusVelogenicVirulent

Identifiers

PMID35266056
OpenAlexW4220982263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.