Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266037›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2022

Artificial intelligence in glomerular diseases.

Francesco P Schena, Riccardo Magistroni, Fedelucio Narducci, Daniela I Abbrescia, Vito W Anelli, Tommaso Di Noia

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A brief review of some artificial intelligence methods in nephrology.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Advances in computational quantitative nephropathology].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco P SchenaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy. paolo.schena@uniba.it.
Riccardo MagistroniDepartment of Nephrology, University of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Fedelucio NarducciDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering, Polytechnic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Daniela I AbbresciaSchena Foundation, Bari, Italy.
Vito W AnelliDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering, Polytechnic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Tommaso Di NoiaDepartment of Electrical and Information Engineering, Polytechnic of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Polytechnic University of Bari · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this narrative review, we focus on the application of artificial intelligence in the clinical history of patients with glomerular disease, digital pathology in kidney biopsy, renal ultrasonography imaging, and prediction of chronic kidney disease (CKD). With the development of natural language processing, the clinical history of a patient can be used to identify a computable phenotype. In kidney pathology, digital imaging has adopted innovative deep learning algorithms (DLAs) that can improve the predictive capability of the examined lesions. However, at this time, these applications can only be used in research because there is no recognized validation to replace the conventional diagnostic applications. Kidney ultrasonography, used in the clinical examination of patients, provides information about the progression of kidney damage. Machine learning algorithms (MLAs) with promising results for the early detection of CKD have been proposed, but, still, they are not solid enough to be incorporated into the clinical practice. A few tools for glomerulonephritis, based on MLAs, are available in clinical practice. They can be downloaded on computers and cellular phones but can only be applied to uniracial cohorts of patients. To improve their performance, it is necessary to organize large consortia with multiracial cohorts. Finally, in many studies MLA development has been carried out using retrospective cohorts. The performance of the models might differ in retrospective cohorts compared to real-world data. Therefore, the models should be validated in prospective external large cohorts.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesArtificial IntelligenceClinical OutcomeDeep Learning AlgorithmGlomerulonephritisMachine Learning AlgorithmNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID35266037
OpenAlexW4220654363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.