Trial reportEuropean heart journal2022
The GUIDE-HF trial of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03387813 (Hemodynamic-GUIDEd Management of Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hemodynamic-GUIDEd Management of Heart Failure
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term trials of colchicine for secondary prevention of vascular events: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of remote pulmonary artery pressure estimating in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials.European heart journal · 2023Pooled it
- Implanted haemodynamic telemonitoring devices to guide management of heart failure: a review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of implantable haemodynamic monitoring in heart failure across ranges of ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2023Pooled it
- Precision-guided heart failure interventions: The expanding role of advanced cardiac imaging and artificial intelligence.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor-Guided Therapy for Cardiac AL Amyloidosis in a Young Multiple Myeloma Patient.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Cheyne-Stokes respiration detected via CPAP devices as a digital biomarker for heart failure in obstructive sleep apnoea: systematic review.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Invasive and Non-Invasive Remote Patient Monitoring Devices for Heart Failure: A Comparative Review of Technical Maturity and Clinical Readiness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Remote pulmonary artery pressure-guided management of patients with heart failure: A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- ANMCO position paper: diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic function.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of colchicine and spironolactone after myocardial infarction: the CLEAR-SYNERGY trial in perspective.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2024Article
- Indications for renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Review
- The favourable alliance between CardioMEMS and levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Rethinking heart failure clinical trials: the heart failure collaboratory.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Impedance-based remote monitoring in patients with heart failure and concomitant chronic kidney disease.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Optimizing outcomes in heart failure: 2022 and beyond.ESC heart failure · 2023Review
- Review
- The COVID-19 pandemic and heart failure: lessons from GUIDE-HF.European heart journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, important changes in heart failure (HF) event rates have been widely reported, but few data address potential causes for these changes; several possibilities were examined in the GUIDE-HF study. METHODS AND
resultsFrom 15 March 2018 to 20 December 2019, patients were randomized to haemodynamic-guided management (treatment) vs. control for 12 months, with a primary endpoint of all-cause mortality plus HF events. Pre-COVID-19, the primary endpoint rate was 0.553 vs. 0.682 events/patient-year in the treatment vs. control group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, P = 0.049]. Treatment difference was no longer evident during COVID-19 (HR 1.11, P = 0.526), with a 21% decrease in the control group (0.536 events/patient-year) and no change in the treatment group (0.597 events/patient-year). Data reflecting provider-, disease-, and patient-dependent factors that might change the primary endpoint rate during COVID-19 were examined. Subject contact frequency was similar in the treatment vs. control group before and during COVID-19. During COVID-19, the monthly rate of medication changes fell 19.2% in the treatment vs. 10.7% in the control group to levels not different between groups (P = 0.362). COVID-19 was infrequent and not different between groups. Pulmonary artery pressure area under the curve decreased -98 mmHg-days in the treatment group vs. -100 mmHg-days in the controls (P = 0.867). Patient compliance with the study protocol was maintained during COVID-19 in both groups.
conclusionDuring COVID-19, the primary event rate decreased in the controls and remained low in the treatment group, resulting in an effacement of group differences that were present pre-COVID-19. These outcomes did not result from changes in provider- or disease-dependent factors; pulmonary artery pressure decreased despite fewer medication changes, suggesting that patient-dependent factors played an important role in these outcomes. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03387813.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.