Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265932›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022

A machine learning-based clinical decision support algorithm for reducing unnecessary coronary angiograms.

J D Schwalm, Shuang Di, Tej Sheth, Madhu K Natarajan, Erin O'Brien, Tara McCready, Jeremy Petch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06648239 (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06648239 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2025 to 2026Enrolled251ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsUsual Care, Centralized triage with risk score-based screening for obstructive CAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J D SchwalmPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Shuang DiCentre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Tej ShethPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Madhu K NatarajanPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Erin O'BrienPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Tara McCreadyPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
Jeremy PetchPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
McMaster University · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conventional clinical risk scores and diagnostic algorithms are proving to be suboptimal in the prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease, contributing to the low diagnostic yield of invasive angiography. Machine learning could help better predict which patients would benefit from invasive angiography vs other noninvasive diagnostic modalities. Objective: To reduce patient risk and cost to the healthcare system by improving the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography through optimized outpatient selection. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 12 years of referral data from a provincial cardiac registry, including all patients referred for invasive angiography of more than 1.4 million individuals in Ontario, Canada. Stable outpatients undergoing coronary angiography during the study period were included in the analysis. The training set (80% random sample, n = 23,750) was used to develop 8 prediction models in Python using grid-search cross-validation. The test set (20% random sample, n = 5938), evaluated the discrimination performance of each model. Results: The machine-learning model achieved a substantially better performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve: 0.81) than existing models for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease in patients referred for invasive angiography. It significantly outperformed both the reference model and current clinical practice with a net reclassification index of 27.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [24.9%-30.8%], Conclusion: This prediction model, when coupled with a point-of-care, online decision support tool to be used by referring physicians, could improve the diagnostic yield of invasive coronary angiography in stable, elective outpatients, thus improving patient safety and reducing healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Coronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomographic angiographyMachine learningPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID35265932
PMCPMC8890355
OpenAlexW4200313034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.