Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265930›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2022

Anatomically informed deep learning on contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for scar segmentation and clinical feature extraction.

Dan M Popescu, Haley G Abramson, Rebecca Yu, Changxin Lai, Julie K Shade, Katherine C Wu, Mauro Maggioni, Natalia A Trayanova

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01076660 (Left Ventricular Structural Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death [Substudy of), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01076660 recruitingnot on this map

Left Ventricular Structural Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death [Substudy of: Functional Energetics and Imaging for Phenotypic Characterization of Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death, See Also NCT000181233]

TypeobservationalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2003 to 2030Enrolled400ConditionsIschemic Cardiomyopathy, Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Twenty-five years of research in cardiac imaging in electrophysiology procedures for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dan M PopescuAlliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation (ADVANCE), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Haley G AbramsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Rebecca YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Changxin LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Julie K ShadeAlliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation (ADVANCE), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Katherine C WuAlliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation (ADVANCE), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mauro MaggioniAlliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation (ADVANCE), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Natalia A TrayanovaAlliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation (ADVANCE), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Predictive multiscale in silico cardio-pharmacologyU01HL126273 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CLANCY, COLLEEN E · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Infarct-related Ventricular Tachycardia Mechanisms: From Micro to ClinicalR01HL142496 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2019 to 2022
$3.1M
Cardiac MR to Improve Clinical Risk Prediction in Defibrilator PatientsR01HL132181 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TOMASELLI, GORDON FRANK, WU, KATHERINE C · 2017 to 2020
$3.1M
LV Structural Predictors of Sudden Cardiac DeathR01HL103812 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WU, KATHERINE C · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
Role of dual-specificity phosphatase 5 (DUSP5) in the regulation of right ventricF32HL124893 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FERGUSON, BRADLEY S · 2014 to 2015
$77k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL124893NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103812NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132181NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142496NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL126273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Visualizing fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging with contrast enhancement (late gadolinium enhancement; LGE) is paramount in characterizing disease progression and identifying arrhythmia substrates. Segmentation and fibrosis quantification from LGE-CMR is intensive, manual, and prone to interobserver variability. There is an unmet need for automated LGE-CMR image segmentation that ensures anatomical accuracy and seamless extraction of clinical features. Objective: This study aimed to develop a novel deep learning solution for analysis of contrast-enhanced CMR images that produces anatomically accurate myocardium and scar/fibrosis segmentations and uses these to calculate features of clinical interest. Methods: Data sources were 155 2-dimensional LGE-CMR patient scans (1124 slices) and 246 synthetic "LGE-like" scans (1360 slices) obtained from cine CMR using a novel style-transfer algorithm. We trained and tested a 3-stage neural network that identified the left ventricle (LV) region of interest (ROI), segmented ROI into viable myocardium and regions of enhancement, and postprocessed the segmentation results to enforce conforming to anatomical constraints. The segmentations were used to directly compute clinical features, such as LV volume and scar burden. Results: Predicted LV and scar segmentations achieved 96% and 75% balanced accuracy, respectively, and 0 Conclusion: We developed and validated a deep neural network for automatic, anatomically accurate expert-level LGE- CMR myocardium and scar/fibrosis segmentation, allowing direct calculation of clinical measures. Given the training set heterogeneity, our approach could be extended to multiple imaging modalities and patient pathologies.

Indexed as

CMRContrast-enhancedDeep learningMachine learningSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35265930
PMCPMC8890075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.