Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265911›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2021

Physical activity, patient-reported symptoms, and clinical events: Insights into postprocedural recovery from personal digital devices.

Victoria L Bartlett, Joseph S Ross, Nilay D Shah, Laura Ciaccio, Joseph G Akar, Peter A Noseworthy, Sanket S Dhruva

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03436082 (Post-Market Surveillance With a Novel mHealth Platform), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03436082 completednot on this map

Post-Market Surveillance With a Novel mHealth Platform

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorYale UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsGastrectomy, Atrial FibrillationArmsA mobile health platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victoria L BartlettYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joseph S RossSection of General Internal Medicine and National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Nilay D ShahDivision of Health Care Delivery Research, Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Laura CiaccioCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joseph G AkarSection of General Internal Medicine and National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Peter A NoseworthyDivision of Health Care Delivery Research, Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sanket S DhruvaSection of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Short-Term Reserch Training: Students in Health SchoolsT35HL007649 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Erica L Herzog · 1987 to 2026
$5.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Personal digital devices may offer insights into patient recovery and an approach for remote monitoring after procedures. Objective: To examine associations between activity measured using personal digital devices, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and clinical events among patients after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) or bariatric surgery. Methods: We aggregated personal digital device, PROM, and electronic health record data in a study conducted at 2 health systems. We used Fitbit devices for step count assessments, KardiaMobile for cardiac rhythm assessments, and PROMs for pain and palpitations over 5 weeks. Results: Among 59 patients, 30 underwent AF ablation and 29 bariatric surgery. Thirty-six patients (63%) reported pain. There was no difference in median [interquartile range] daily steps between patients with and those without pain (4419 [3286-7041] vs 3498 [2609-5888]; Conclusion: Personal digital device and PROM data can provide insight into postprocedural recovery outside of usual clinical settings and may inform follow-up and clinical decision-making. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03436082).

Indexed as

AblationActivityAtrial fibrillationBariatric surgeryDigital healthPatient-reported outcomesPostprocedural recoveryRemote monitoringWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID35265911
PMCPMC8890038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.