ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2021
A virtual platform to deliver ambulatory care for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced applications in chronic disease monitoring using IoT mobile sensing device data, machine learning algorithms and frame theory: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Considering User Experience and Behavioral Approaches in the Design of mHealth Interventions for Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Health Literacy Interventions and Outcomes in Patients WithAtrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Insights from a single centre implementation of a digitally-enabled atrial fibrillation virtual ward.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, screening and digital health.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
- Telehealth Satisfaction in Patients Receiving Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care: Quantitative Exploratory Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- The digital journey: 25 years of digital development in electrophysiology from an Europace perspective.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Digitally enabled acute care for atrial fibrillation: conception, feasibility and early outcomes of an AF virtual ward.Open heart · 2023Article
- Patients' Experiences With the Fit of Virtual Atrial Fibrillation Care During the Pandemic: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2021
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an online educational and treatment platform, with a randomized sub-study examining the use of an ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram heart monitor (AHM). Follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was patients' platform use; success was defined as 90% of patients using the platform at least once, and 75% using it at least twice. The primary outcome in the AHM sub-study was Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) score. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction questionnaires, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for AF. Results: We enrolled 94 patients between July 2018 and May 2019; 83% of patients logged in at least once and 54.3% more than once. Patients who were older, were male, or had new-onset AF were more likely to log in to the platform. Satisfaction scores were high; 70%-94% of patients responded favorably. Quality-of-life scores improved at 3 and 6 months. In the AHM sub-study (n = 71), those who received an AHM had lower AFSS scores (least square mean difference -2.52, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.25, Conclusion: The online platform did not reach our feasibility target but was well received. Allocation of an AHM was associated with improved quality of life. Virtual AF care shows promise and should be evaluated in further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.