Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265885›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal

A novel wireless implant for central venous pressure measurement: First animal experience.

Tejaswini Manavi, Patricia Vazquez, Helen O'Grady, Jerson Martina, Michael Rose, Douglas Nielsen, David Fitzpatrick, Omid Forouzan, Michael Nagy, Faisal Sharif and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tejaswini ManaviCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Patricia VazquezCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Helen O'GradyCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Jerson MartinaEndotronix, Inc, Lisle, Illinois.
Michael RoseEndotronix, Inc, Lisle, Illinois.
Douglas NielsenEndotronix, Inc, Lisle, Illinois.
David FitzpatrickEndotronix Ireland Limited, Dublin, Ireland.
Omid ForouzanEndotronix, Inc, Lisle, Illinois.
Michael NagyEndotronix, Inc, Lisle, Illinois.
Faisal SharifCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Haroon ZafarCardiovascular Research & Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Endotronix (United States) · USOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: Central venous pressure (CVP) serves as a surrogate for right atrial pressure, and thus could potentially predict a wider range of heart failure conditions. The purpose of this work is to assess CVP, through an implantable sensor incorporated with a novel anchor design, in the inferior and superior vena cava of an animal model. Methods: Two animals (Dorset sheep) were implanted with sensors at 3 different locations: inferior vena cava (IVC), superior vena cava (SVC), and pulmonary artery (PA). Two sensors with distinct anchor designs considering anatomical requirements were used. A standard PA sensor (trade name Cordella) was deployed in the PA and SVC, whereas a sensor with a modified cylindrical anchor with various struts was designed to reside in the IVC. Each implant was calibrated against a Millar catheter reference sensor. The ability of the central venous sensors to detect changes in pressure was evaluated by modifying the fluid volume of the animal. Results: The sensors implanted in both sheep were successful, which provided an opportunity to understand the relationship between PA and CVP via simultaneous readings. The mapping and implantation in the IVC took less than 15 minutes. Multiple readings were taken at each implant location using a hand-held reader device under various conditions. CVP recorded in the IVC (6.49 mm Hg) and SVC (6.14 mm Hg) were nearly the same. PA pressure (13-14 mm Hg) measured was higher than CVP, as expected. The SVC waveforms showed clear beats and respiration. Respiration could be seen in the IVC waveforms, but not all beats were easily distinguishable. Both SVC and IVC readings showed increases in pressure (3.7 and 2.7 mm Hg for SVC and IVC, respectively) after fluid overload was induced via extra saline administration. Conclusion: In this work, the feasibility of measuring CVP noninvasively was demonstrated. The established ability of wireless PA pressure sensors to enable prevention of decompensation events weeks ahead can now be explored using central venous versions of such sensors.

Indexed as

Central venous pressureHeart failureHemodynamic sensorWireless hemodynamic monitoringWireless implant

Identifiers

PMID35265885
PMCPMC8890339
OpenAlexW3094639178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.