ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal
Incidence, duration, pattern, and burden of
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the Role of Implantable Loop Recorders: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Yields Across Seven Clinical Indications in 388 Real-World Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- [Oral anticoagulation in supraventricular arrhythmia].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Incidence and patterns of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter-the FLUTFIB study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- [Isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter : Clinical course after isthmus ablation].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2021
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Following cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, many patients with atrial flutter (AFL) are diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). The incidence, duration, pattern, and burden of AF remain undefined. These may have implications for the management of these patients. Objective: To classify the incidence, duration, pattern, and burden of AF/AFL using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) after CTI ablation. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with CTI-dependent AFL, no known history of AF, and CHA Results: Fifty-two patients (81% male; 73 ± 9 years; CHA Conclusion: Following CTI ablation in AFL patients, although AF/AFL occurs in most patients, the burden is low and episodes were <24 hours in the majority of patients. Additional studies are needed to determine whether long-term electrocardiographic monitoring can help guide management of patients undergoing CTI ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.