Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265878›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal

Utilizing electronic health data and machine learning for the prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission or all-cause mortality in heart failure.

Ashley N Beecy, Manasa Gummalla, Evan Sholle, Zhuoran Xu, Yiye Zhang, Kelly Michalak, Kristina Dolan, Yasin Hussain, Benjamin C Lee, Yongkang Zhang and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influential Usage of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley N BeecyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Manasa GummallaDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Evan SholleInformation Technologies & Services, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Zhuoran XuDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Yiye ZhangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Kelly MichalakDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Kristina DolanDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Yasin HussainYale Cardiovascular Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Benjamin C LeeDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Yongkang ZhangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Parag GoyalDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Thomas R CampionInformation Technologies & Services, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Leslee J ShawDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Lohendran BaskaranDalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Subhi J Al'ArefDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Cornell University · USWeill Cornell Medicine · USPresbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Existing risk assessment tools for heart failure (HF) outcomes use structured databases with static, single-timepoint clinical data and have limited accuracy. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive approach for accurate prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission and all-cause mortality (ACM) that integrates clinical and physiological data available in the electronic health record system. Methods: Three predictive models for 30-day unplanned readmissions or ACM were created using an extreme gradient boosting approach: (1) index admission model; (2) index discharge model; and (3) feature-aggregated model. Performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) metric and compared with that of the HOSPITAL score, a widely used predictive model for hospital readmission. Results: A total of 3774 patients with a primary billing diagnosis of HF were included (614 experienced the primary outcome), with 796 variables used in the admission and discharge models, and 2032 in the feature-aggregated model. The index admission model had AUC = 0.723, the index discharge model had AUC = 0.754, and the feature-aggregated model had AUC = 0.756 for prediction of 30-day unplanned readmission or ACM. For comparison, the HOSPITAL score had AUC = 0.666 (admission model: Conclusion: These models predict risk of HF hospitalizations and ACM in patients admitted with HF and emphasize the importance of incorporating large numbers of variables in machine learning models to identify predictors for future investigation.

Indexed as

Big dataElectronic health dataHeart failureMachine learningReadmission

Identifiers

PMID35265878
PMCPMC8890080
OpenAlexW3094461206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.