ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal
Comparative analysis between convolutional neural network learned and engineered features: A case study on cardiac arrhythmia detection.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ECG-SMART-NET: A Deep Learning Architecture for Precise ECG Diagnosis of Occlusion Myocardial Infarction.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2021
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiovascular problems, and its asymptomatic tendency makes AF detection challenging. Machine and deep learning methods are commonly used in AF detection. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the information provided by convolutional neural network (CNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models for AF classification. Methods: We manually extracted 166 time-frequency domains and linear and nonlinear features to classify single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) as normal, AF, other, or noisy sinus rhythms. We selected a subset of 56 robust features using a genetic algorithm that was used in the RF model. In a separate study, a 1-dimensional, 12-layer CNN was designed on the raw ECG rhythms. Four features from the output layer and 128 features from the fully connected layer of CNN were explored independently for classification. The models were trained and internally validated on 8,528 ECGs and externally validated on a hidden dataset containing 3,658 ECGs. Next,we analyzed the correlation between engineered and CNN-learned features. Results: An RF classifier trained with 56-engineered features resulted in an F Conclusion: We explored various features and machine learning models to identify AF rhythms using short (9-61 seconds) single-lead ECG recordings. Our results showed that the proposed CNN model abstracted distinctive features for AF classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.