Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265723›Full record

ArticleBurns & trauma2022

The clinical effectiveness and safety of using epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor as therapeutics in acute skin wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yating Wei, Jiangfeng Li, Yao Huang, Xun Lei, Lijun Zhang, Meifang Yin, Jiawen Deng, Xiaoyan Wang, Xiaobing Fu, Jun Wu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Burns & trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. EGF-loaded, bioactive-richFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yating WeiDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Department of Wound Repair, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-2171
Jiangfeng LiDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Department of Wound Repair, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yao HuangShenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xun LeiSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lijun ZhangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Department of Wound Repair, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Meifang YinDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Department of Wound Repair, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jiawen DengDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Department of Wound Repair, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoyan WangThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaobing FuResearch Center for Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration, Medical Innovation Research Department, The Key Laboratory of PLA Wound Repair and Tissue Regeneration, the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, the PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Jun WuDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Department of Wound Repair, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNChongqing Public Health Medical Center · CNShenzhen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Promoting wound healing is crucial to restore the vital barrier function of injured skin. Growth factor products including epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have been used for decades although no systematic evaluation exists regarding their effectiveness and safety issues in treating acute skin wounds. This has resulted in a lack of guidelines and standards for proper application regimes. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to critically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these growth factors on skin acute wounds and provide guidelines for application regimes. Methods: We searched PubMed/Medline (1980-2020), Cochrane Library (1980-2020), Cochrane CENTRAL (from establishment to 2020), ClinicalTrials.gov (from establishment to 2020), Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CNKI, 1994-2020), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM, 1978-2019), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP, 1989-2020) and Wanfang Database (WFDATA, 1980-2019). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and controlled clinical trials treating patients with acute skin wounds from various causes and with those available growth factors were included. Results: A total of 7573 papers were identified through database searching; 229 papers including 281 studies were kept after final screening. Administering growth factors significantly shortened the healing time of acute skin wounds, including superficial burn injuries [mean difference (MD) = -3.02; 95% confidence interval (CI):-3.31 ~ -2.74; Conclusions: The studied growth factors not only are effective and safe for managing acute skin wounds, but also accelerate their healing with no severe adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Growth factorsMeta-analysisSkin woundsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID35265723
PMCPMC8900703
OpenAlexW4212786085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.