ArticleJournal of diabetes research2022
Corneal Nerve Parameter Reference Values for Chinese Adults Assessed by Corneal Confocal Microscopy.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal Nerve Fiber Morphology and Biological Age in Healthy Adults.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Differential Characteristics, Mechanisms, and Clinical Strategies for Perioperative Dry Eye in Presenile Cataract and Age-Related Cataract.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Annotated Corneal Confocal Microscopy Dataset for Nerve Segmentation and Clinical Characterization.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Development of Diagnostic Nomograms Using Corneal Nerve Parameters for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Ethnic and sex differences in corneal nerves and corneal epithelial cells in healthy population.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Corneal nerve changes by anti-glaucoma medications examined byInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Corneal characteristics of Mongolian population with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy in inner Mongolia, China: an assessment using corneal confocal microscopy.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Confocal corneal microscopy is an excellent new noninvasive tool for assessing diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We aimed to investigate the clinical variables associated with corneal nerve parameters and establish reference values for clinical use in healthy Chinese adults. Methods: The study enlisted 257 healthy volunteers (137 females and 120 males) from two clinical academic centers in China. Two experts captured and selected images of the central corneal subbasal nerve plexus at each center using the same corneal confocal microscopy instrument according to a commonly adopted protocol. Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) were measured using fully automated software (ACCMetrics). The correlation between clinical indicators and confocal corneal microscopy measures was determined using partial correlation. Quantile regression was used to calculate reference values and estimate the effects of clinical factors on the normative values of confocal corneal microscopy measures. Results: Females had significantly higher CNFD, CNBD, and CNFL than males. There was no correlation between age, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and any corneal nerve fiber parameter in both sexes. In either sex, age, weight, height, BMI, and HbA1c did not affect the 0.05 Conclusions: This study establishes sex-adjusted reference values for corneal confocal microscopy measures in Chinese adults and provides a reference for clinical practice and research with this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.