Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

COVI-Prim Longitudinal Survey: Experiences of Primary Care Physicians During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Dagmar Schaffler-Schaden, Karola Mergenthal, Alexander Avian, Sebastian Huter, Ulrike Spary-Kainz, Herbert Bachler, Maria Flamm, Andrea Siebenhofer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dagmar Schaffler-SchadenInstitute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Alexander AvianInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian HuterInstitute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Ulrike Spary-KainzInstitute of General Practice and Evidence Based Health Services Research, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Herbert BachlerInstitute of General Practice, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Maria FlammInstitute for General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Andrea SiebenhoferInstitute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) are the mainstay of primary care and play a critical role in pandemics. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, this international study aimed to explore changes in the workload of general practitioners, as well as their interactions with patients and colleagues, and their self-confidence and concerns. Methods: An online survey was conducted among GPs in Austria and Germany. Participants were asked to answer a basic questionnaire and participate in a subsequent longitudinal survey containing closed and open-ended items. All data were pseudonymized. Results: Overall, 723 general practitioners from Austria and Germany took part in the longitudinal survey over a period of 12 weeks (April 3-July 2, 2020). The majority of GPs had less direct contact with patients at the beginning of the survey (96 vs. 49% at the end of the study period). At first, doctors were mainly concerned with pandemic-related issues and had to care for the patients of GP colleagues that were in quarantine, which meant they had less time for routine work such as screenings and treating chronic diseases. Over the survey period, GPs' self-confidence increased and their concerns about income loss decreased. Conclusions: Following a difficult initial phase when protective equipment and information were lacking, physicians in primary care adapted quickly to new situations. Experience with telemedicine should help them face future challenges and may help prevent a decline in the delivery of routine health care and care for chronically ill patients. Registration: Trial registration at the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00021231.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicgeneral practitionerinteractions with patients and colleagueslongitudinal surveyprimary careself-confidencework loadworries

Identifiers

PMID35265636
PMCPMC8898947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.