Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265346›Full record

ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2021

Application of 2D Gait Analysis for the Assessment of Gait Disturbance in Patients with Spastic Tetraparesis.

A S Eliseev, S Ya Kalinina, K S Yashin, A S Zolotova, I N Morozov, K V Slavin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A S EliseevAssistant, Kolokoltsev Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
S Ya KalininaAssistant, Kolokoltsev Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
K S YashinAssistant, Kolokoltsev Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
A S ZolotovaStudent Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
I N MorozovHead of the Center for Neurorehabilitation in Spine and Spinal Cord Disorders Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin and Pozharsky Square, Nizhny Novgorod, 603005, Russia.
K V SlavinProfessor, Head of the Stereotaxic and Functional Neurosurgery Department University of Illinois at Chicago, 1200 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Stereotaxis (United States) · USNational Center for Spinal Disorders · HUPrivolzhsky Research Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials and Methods: The study included 12 patients with tetraparesis of various etiologies. Gait assessment was performed by video analysis using reflective markers (1.5 cm) and a special walking platform. The spatial coordinates of the markers were determined by capturing the reflected light with infrared LEDs located around the lenses of video cameras. Results: Using 2D gait analysis, numerical indicators of gait disturbance in spastic tetraparesis were obtained. We found a prolongation of the stand phase with a shortening of the swing phase (from 81.9 [76.1; 89.2] to 85.3 [74.4; 90.2]%; p=0.97) and the period of the double step (from 0.50 [0.45; 0.96] to 0.40 [0.34; 0.66]; p=0.4) in comparison with the target (normal) values (60% - for the stand phase; 1.41 - for the double-step period). The movements in the hip, knee, and ankle joints are described using numerical values.We then compared the data obtained from the left and right sides of the patient's body: there were no statistically significant differences between the two sets of data. We also compared the gait characteristics before and after treatment (in 4 patients). Statistically significant differences in values were obtained for the stand and swing phases (p=0.035), the range of motion in the hip joint (p=0.01), and gait velocity (p=0.046). Kendall's analysis revealed no significant correlation between the data obtained by video gait analysis and the gait changes by the Modified Ashworth Scale (р>0.05). Conclusion: 2D gait analysis is a promising method for quantifying gait disturbance in patients with spastic tetraparesis. It allows one to identify characteristic gait patterns, in particular, an increase in the stand phase with a shortening of the swing phase and the double step period, as well as a decrease in the range of motion in the hip joints with an increase in the knee and ankle ones.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisMuscle SpasticityGaitHumansRange of Motion, ArticularWalking2D gait analysisgait biomechanics in tetraparesisgait in spastic tetraparesisspastic tetraparesis

Identifiers

PMID35265346
PMCPMC8858409
OpenAlexW3210554747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.