Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265300›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

A Liver Damage Prediction Using Partial Differential Segmentation with Improved Convolutional Neural Network.

B Sumathy, Pankaj Dadheech, Monika Jain, Ankur Saxena, S Hemalatha, Wenqi Liu, Stephen Jeswinde Nuagah

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

B SumathyDepartment of Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Sri Sairam Engineering College, Chennai, India.
Pankaj DadheechDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Swami Keshvanand Institute of Technology, Management & Gramothan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5783-1989
Monika JainDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, ITS Engineering College, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ankur SaxenaIndus Institute of Information & Communication Technology, Indus University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-3126
S HemalathaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Panimalar Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Wenqi LiuHenan Chuitian Technology Co., LTD, Hebi 458000, China.
Stephen Jeswinde NuagahDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Tamale Technical University, Tamale, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-5687-9649
Indus University · INInstitute of Technology Management · INShijia Photons (China) · CNTamale Teaching Hospital · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The liver is one of the most significant and most essential organs in the human body. It is divided into two granular lobes, one on the right and one on the left, connected by a bile duct. The liver is essential in the removal of waste products from human food consumption, the creation of bile, the regulation of metabolic activities, the cleaning of the blood by sensitizing digestive management, and the storage of vitamins and minerals. To perform the classification of liver illnesses using computed tomography (CT scans), two critical phases must first be completed: liver segmentation and categorization. The most difficult challenge in categorizing liver disease is distinguishing the liver from the other organs near it. Results: Several accuracies, sensitivity, and specificity measurements are produced to assess the categorization of LSM using an Improved Convolutional classifier. Approximately, 97.5% of the performance accuracy of the liver categorization is achieved with a 94.5% continuous interval (CI) of [0.6775 1.0000] and an error rate of 2.1%. The suggested method's performance is compared to that of two existing algorithms, and the sensitivity and specificity provide an overall average of 96% and 93%, respectively, with 95% Continuous Interval of [0.7513 1.0000] and [0.7126 1.0000] for sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35265300
PMCPMC8898868
OpenAlexW4214612953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.