Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35265188›Full record

ReviewShoulder & elbow2022

Early functional mobilization for non-operative treatment of simple elbow dislocations: a systematic review.

Michael Catapano, Nikola Pupic, Iqbal Multani, David Wasserstein, Patrick Henry

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating 3D-Printed Guide Plates in Elbow Fixation: A Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  5. Management of Elderly Elbow Fractures.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael CatapanoDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-227X
Nikola PupicDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-1396
Iqbal MultaniRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David WassersteinDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patrick HenryDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CARoyal North Shore Hospital · AUUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aims to elucidate a non-operative rehabilitation program that optimizes recovery based on published approaches and outcomes. Methods: Searches of four databases from inception to 1 January 2020 were performed to identify clinical studies addressing the non-operative management of simple elbow dislocations. Results: Of 2435 studies that were eligible for title screen, 15 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Three randomized control studies demonstrated that early mobilization expedited the return of range of motion, function and return to work or activities, however, resulted in increased pain within the six-week rehabilitation period compared to Plaster of Paris casting for 21 days. Patients returned to work sooner after early mobilization (10 vs. 18 days; p = 0.02) compared to Plaster of Paris casting. In all studies, early mobilization resulted in similar re-dislocation rates of 1.3% (3/237) versus 2.2% (12/549) in those with Plaster of Paris casting as well as lower incidence of heterotopic ossification (36% vs. 54%). No significant differences between rehabilitation protocols were determined; however, the large majority of recent papers utilized rehabilitation protocols. Conclusion: Early mobilization of simple elbow dislocations results in early return of Range-of-Motion, function and return to work with no increase in complication rates; however, increased pain during the rehabilitation period.

Indexed as

Elbow dislocationrehabilitationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35265188
PMCPMC8899322
OpenAlexW3091662269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.