Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264981›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Perceived Fatality Prior to COVID-19 Infection in 13 Latin American Countries (FAT-LAT-COVID-19): Revalidation of a Shortened Scale.

Christian R Mejia, Telmo Raúl Aveiro-Róbalo, Luciana D Garlisi-Torales, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban, Oscar Mamani-Benito, Martín A Vilela-Estrada, Víctor Serna-Alarcón, Damary S Jaramillo-Aguilar, Javiera L Rojas-Roa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian R MejiaCenter for Translational Medicine Research, Norbert Wiener University, Lima, Peru.
Telmo Raúl Aveiro-RóbaloUniversidad del Pacifico, Asunción, Paraguay.
Luciana D Garlisi-ToralesUniversidad del Pacifico, Asunción, Paraguay.
Renzo Felipe Carranza EstebanGrupo de Investigación Avances en Investigación Psicológica, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
Oscar Mamani-BenitoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Peruana Unión, Juliaca, Peru.
Martín A Vilela-EstradaEscuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Trujillo, Peru.
Víctor Serna-AlarcónEscuela de Medicina Humana, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Trujillo, Peru.
Damary S Jaramillo-AguilarEscuela de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Javiera L Rojas-RoaUniversidad Mayor de Temuco, Temuco, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 has generated great repercussions for the population globally; millions of deaths have been reported worldwide. The idea of death is especially exacerbated when there are close to death experiences that remind us how close we are to fatality. This is why it is important to measure fatalistic ideas of those who have not yet been infected. Objective: To revalidate a scale that measures fatalistic perception prior to COVID-19 infection in a population of 13 Latin American countries. Methodology: We conducted an instrumental study. We used a previously validated scale in Peru, with seven items divided into two factors and with five possible Likert-type responses (from strongly disagree to strongly agree). It was administered to a large population in 13 Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America; for each of the seven questions, 886 people were surveyed. With these results, descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. Results: The mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of the seven initial questions were adequate in most cases. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the lack of fit was improved with the indexes' modification technique, which let us delete items 1 and 6. Thus, we could obtain satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.972, TLI = 0.931, GFI = 0.990, AGFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.080, and RMR = 0.047). Therefore, the final two-factor structure had a fairly adequate Cronbach's α (0.72, with a 95% confidence interval = 0.70-0.73). Conclusions: The scale that measures fatalism of Latin American countries in the face of the pandemic generated by COVID-19 was revalidated and shortened.

Indexed as

coronavirus infectionsfatalistic perceptionLatin Americapandemicsvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID35264981
PMCPMC8899029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.