Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264945›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Integrating Environment and Aging Research: Opportunities for Synergy and Acceleration.

Kristen M C Malecki, Julie K Andersen, Andrew M Geller, G Jean Harry, Chandra L Jackson, Katherine A James, Gary W Miller, Mary Ann Ottinger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Older adults and extreme weather events: recommendations from the Research Centers Collaborative Network workshop.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of Molecular Responses and Longevity Markers inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quiescence Multiverse.Biomolecules · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen M C MaleckiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Julie K AndersenBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, United States.
Andrew M GellerUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC, United States.
G Jean HarryDivision of National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, United States.
Chandra L JacksonDivision of Intramural Research, Department of Health and Human Services, Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, NC, United States.
Katherine A JamesDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States.
Gary W MillerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Mary Ann OttingerDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Buck Institute for Research on Aging · USColorado School of Public Health · USColumbia University · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Social and Environmental Determinants of Health EquityZIAES103325 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JACKSON, CHANDRA · 2017 to 2025
$12.7M
Researching Institutional and Psychosocial Sources of Resiliency to Accelerated Biological AgingR01AG061080 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ENGELMAN, MICHAL, MALECKI, KRISTEN MARY CHOSSEK · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant overlaps in mission, the fields of environmental health sciences and aging biology are just beginning to intersect. It is increasingly clear that genetics alone does not predict an individual's neurological aging and sensitivity to disease. Accordingly, aging neuroscience is a growing area of mutual interest within environmental health sciences. The impetus for this review came from a workshop hosted by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in June of 2020, which focused on integrating the science of aging and environmental health research. It is critical to bridge disciplines with multidisciplinary collaborations across toxicology, comparative biology, epidemiology to understand the impacts of environmental toxicant exposures and age-related outcomes. This scoping review aims to highlight overlaps and gaps in existing knowledge and identify essential research initiatives. It begins with an overview of aging biology and biomarkers, followed by examples of synergy with environmental health sciences. New areas for synergistic research and policy development are also discussed. Technological advances including next-generation sequencing and other-omics tools now offer new opportunities, including exposomic research, to integrate aging biomarkers into environmental health assessments and bridge disciplinary gaps. This is necessary to advance a more complete mechanistic understanding of how life-time exposures to toxicants and other physical and social stressors alter biological aging. New cumulative risk frameworks in environmental health sciences acknowledge that exposures and other external stressors can accumulate across the life course and the advancement of new biomarkers of exposure and response grounded in aging biology can support increased understanding of population vulnerability. Identifying the role of environmental stressors, broadly defined, on aging biology and neuroscience can similarly advance opportunities for intervention and translational research. Several areas of growing research interest include expanding exposomics and use of multi-omics, the microbiome as a mediator of environmental stressors, toxicant mixtures and neurobiology, and the role of structural and historical marginalization and racism in shaping persistent disparities in population aging and outcomes. Integrated foundational and translational aging biology research in environmental health sciences is needed to improve policy, reduce disparities, and enhance the quality of life for older individuals.

Indexed as

aging biologycumulative riskexposomegerotoxicologytoxicants

Identifiers

PMID35264945
PMCPMC8901047
OpenAlexW4212870448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.