ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2022
A Factor Analysis Model for Rapid Evaluation of the Semen Quality of Fertile Men in China.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Diagnostic Value and Potential Therapeutic Targets of Phenylalanine Metabolism in Pancreatic Cancer via Integrated Multi-Omics and Machine Learning.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Factor Analysis of Semen Quality in Chicken and Its Impact on Fertility.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to reduce the dimension of several indicators with a strong correlation when conducting semen quality analysis in a small number of comprehensive variables that could retain most of the information in the original variables. Methods: A total of 1132 subjects were recruited from the Maternal and Child Health Institutions of seven provinces in mainland China. They completed the questionnaire and provided semen samples. Visualization of the correlation between variables was realized by using a function chart and correlation in the PerformanceAnalytics package of the R programming language (version 3.6.3 [2020-02-29]). Factor analysis was conducted using the principal function in the psych package of R. Principal component analysis, combined with varimax rotation, was used in the operation of the model, and two common factors were selected and measured to provide values for the common factor. The score coefficient was estimated using the regression method. Results: The contribution rates of the two common factors to variable X were 43.7% and 33.98%, respectively. When the two common factors were selected, approximately 78% of the information of the original variables could be explained. The correlation coefficients between the first common factor (the quantitative factor) and sperm density, total sperm count, and semen volume were 0.824, 0.984, and 0.544, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the second common factor (the quality factor) and sperm motility and the percentage of forward-moving (progressive spermatozoa) sperm were 0.978 and 0.976, respectively. Conclusion: The correlation between the original variables of a semen quality analysis was strong and suitable for dimensionality reduction by factor analysis. Factor analysis and dimensionality reduction provide a fast and accurate assessment of semen quality. Patients with low fertility or infertility can be identified and provided with corresponding treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.