Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264848›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Disease Burden and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in England.

Leah B Sansbury, David A Lipson, Chanchal Bains, Glenn A Anley, Kieran J Rothnie, Afisi S Ismaila

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Proactive Strategies for Mitigating Cardiopulmonary Risk in COPD.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  5. Is Disease Stability an Attainable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Goal?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Leah B SansburyValue Evidence and Outcomes, Epidemiology, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
David A LipsonRespiratory Clinical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-4593
Chanchal BainsValue Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.
Glenn A AnleyUK Health Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.
Kieran J RothnieValue Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.
Afisi S IsmailaValue Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-8308
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical guidelines for COPD management suggest pharmacologic treatment algorithms based on symptoms and exacerbation history. As previous research has suggested that prescribing patterns are not always aligned with these recommendations, this study investigated the burden of disease in patients with COPD receiving, and persisting on, new inhaled maintenance therapy. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using two linked electronic databases containing health records of patients in England. Patients aged ≥35 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD, and who initiated a new inhaled respiratory pharmacologic maintenance regimen between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016 (index date) were eligible for inclusion. New treatments could be long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long-acting β Results: In total, 25,350 eligible patients were identified, of these 8282 (mean age: 70.9 years; 51.5% male) persisted with their newly prescribed inhaled therapy for ≥12 months and were included in the analysis. In the 12 months prior to index, 54% of patients had moderate or severe dyspnea (Medical Research Council score ≥3). The most common therapy initiated at index was MITT (42%), followed by ICS/LABA dual therapy (31.2%). The proportion of patients with moderate or severe dyspnea in the post-index period ranged from 29.0% of patients receiving ICS to 64.2% of patients receiving MITT. In the post-index period, 48.1% of patients experienced ≥1 exacerbation and 54.9% had ≥5 general practitioner visits. Conclusion: Many of the patients with COPD in our study continued to experience symptoms and exacerbations, despite persisting on the same treatment for ≥12 months. This suggests that some patients may benefit from treatment modification in accordance with guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedBronchodilator AgentsCost of IllnessDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic Antagonistschronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseexacerbationsgeneral practicehealthcare utilizationmaintenance therapy

Identifiers

PMID35264848
PMCPMC8901413
OpenAlexW4214886415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.