Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264786›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2022

Liquid biopsies to monitor and direct cancer treatment in colorectal cancer.

Gianluca Mauri, Pietro Paolo Vitiello, Alberto Sogari, Giovanni Crisafulli, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Silvia Marsoni, Salvatore Siena, Alberto Bardelli

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treatment Response Evaluation by Ultra-Deep Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA and Matched White Blood Cells.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Clinical implications of Alu-based cell-free DNA and serum onco-piRNA monitoring in colorectal cancer management.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gianluca Mauri *IFOM-FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Pietro Paolo Vitiello *Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, TO, Italy.
Alberto SogariCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, TO, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-6109
Giovanni CrisafulliCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, TO, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-1555
Andrea Sartore-BianchiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-0409
Silvia MarsoniIFOM-FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-7122
Salvatore SienaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-2846
Alberto BardelliCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060, Candiolo, TO, Italy. alberto.bardelli@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1647-5070
Candiolo Cancer Institute · ITUniversity of Milan · ITIFOM · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent and deadly cancers worldwide. Despite recent improvements in treatment and prevention, most of the current therapeutic options are weighted by side effects impacting patients' quality of life. Better patient selection towards systemic treatments represents an unmet clinical need. The recent multidisciplinary and molecular advancements in the treatment of CRC patients demand the identification of efficient biomarkers allowing to personalise patient care. Currently, core tumour biopsy specimens represent the gold-standard biological tissue to identify such biomarkers. However, technical feasibility, tumour heterogeneity and cancer evolution are major limitations of this single-snapshot approach. Genotyping circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been addressed as potentially overcoming such limitations. Indeed, ctDNA has been retrospectively demonstrated capable of identifying minimal residual disease post-surgery and post-adjuvant treatment, as well as spotting druggable molecular alterations for tailoring treatments in metastatic disease. In this review, we summarise the available evidence on ctDNA applicability in CRC. Then, we review ongoing clinical trials assessing how liquid biopsy can be used interventionally to guide therapeutic choice in localised, locally advanced and metastatic CRC. Finally, we discuss how its widespread could transform CRC patients' management, dissecting its limitations while suggesting improvement strategies.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm, ResidualQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID35264786
PMCPMC9346106
OpenAlexW4221112333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.