Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264655›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Automatic differentiation of Grade I and II meningiomas on magnetic resonance image using an asymmetric convolutional neural network.

April Vassantachart, Yufeng Cao, Michael Gribble, Samuel Guzman, Jason C Ye, Kyle Hurth, Anna Mathew, Gabriel Zada, Zhaoyang Fan, Eric L Chang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interpretable AI-assisted clinical decision making (CDM) for dose prescription in radiosurgery of brain metastases.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brain MRI Radiomic First-Order Features for Presurgical Prediction of Meningioma Grading.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

April Vassantachart *Department of Radiation Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yufeng Cao *Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Division, Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Michael GribbleKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Samuel GuzmanDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jason C YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Division, Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Kyle HurthDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anna MathewDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gabriel ZadaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zhaoyang FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Division, Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Eric L ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Division, Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Wensha YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics Division, Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. Wensha.Yang@med.usc.edu.

Funding

Mentored Career DevelopmentKL2TR001854 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Elizabeth Rhea Erwin Burner, Amy Elizabeth West · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Multi-Task MR Simulation for Abdominal Radiation Treatment PlanningR01EB029088 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FAN, ZHAOYANG, YANG, WENSHA · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
Novel four dimensional magnetic resonance imaging to monitor pancreatic tumor infiltrating blood vessels and tumor response to chemoradiation therapyR21CA234637 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FAN, ZHAOYANG, YANG, WENSHA · 2019 to 2020
$413k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001854NCI NIH HHS R21 CA234637NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Grade of meningioma has significant implications for selecting treatment regimens ranging from observation to surgical resection with adjuvant radiation. For most patients, meningiomas are diagnosed radiologically, and Grade is not determined unless a surgical procedure is performed. The goal of this study is to train a novel auto-classification network to determine Grade I and II meningiomas using T1-contrast enhancing (T1-CE) and T2-Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance (MR) images. Ninety-six consecutive treatment naïve patients with pre-operative T1-CE and T2-FLAIR MR images and subsequent pathologically diagnosed intracranial meningiomas were evaluated. Delineation of meningiomas was completed on both MR images. A novel asymmetric 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was constructed with two encoding paths based on T1-CE and T2-FLAIR. Each path used the same 3 × 3 × 3 kernel with different filters to weigh the spatial features of each sequence separately. Final model performance was assessed by tenfold cross-validation. Of the 96 patients, 55 (57%) were pathologically classified as Grade I and 41 (43%) as Grade II meningiomas. Optimization of our model led to a filter weighting of 18:2 between the T1-CE and T2-FLAIR MR image paths. 86 (90%) patients were classified correctly, and 10 (10%) were misclassified based on their pre-operative MRs with a model sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.93. Among the misclassified, 4 were Grade I, and 6 were Grade II. The model is robust to tumor locations and sizes. A novel asymmetric CNN with two differently weighted encoding paths was developed for successful automated meningioma grade classification. Our model outperforms CNN using a single path for single or multimodal MR-based classification.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35264655
PMCPMC8907289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.