Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264596›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Detection of germline variants in Brazilian breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing.

Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini, Danilo Vilela Viana, João Paulo Fumio Whitaker Kitajima, Vinícius Marques Rocha, Rossana Verónica Mendoza López, Yonglan Zheng, Érika Freitas, Fabiola Paoli Mendes Monteiro, André Valim, David Schlesinger and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Moderate-Low Risk Breast Cancer Gene Expression in a Romanian Population.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo Santa Cruz GuindaliniCentro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia (CTO), Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av Dr Arnaldo, 251, 8th floor, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, ZIP 01246‑000, Brazil. rodrigoscg@gmail.com.
Danilo Vilela VianaMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
João Paulo Fumio Whitaker KitajimaMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vinícius Marques RochaCentro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia (CTO), Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av Dr Arnaldo, 251, 8th floor, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, ZIP 01246‑000, Brazil.
Rossana Verónica Mendoza LópezCentro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia (CTO), Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av Dr Arnaldo, 251, 8th floor, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, ZIP 01246‑000, Brazil.
Yonglan ZhengDepartment of Medicine, Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Érika FreitasMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiola Paoli Mendes MonteiroMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
André ValimMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
David SchlesingerMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando KokMendelics Análise Genomica SA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Olufunmilayo I OlopadeDepartment of Medicine, Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike FolgueiraCentro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia (CTO), Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HCFMUSP), Av Dr Arnaldo, 251, 8th floor, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, ZIP 01246‑000, Brazil.
Mendelics · BRGenomic (Brazil) · BRCancer Genetics (United States) · USHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic diversity of germline variants in breast cancer (BC) predisposition genes is unexplored in miscegenated populations, such those living in Latin America. We evaluated 1663 Brazilian BC patients, who underwent hereditary multigene panel testing (20-38 cancer susceptibility genes), to determine the spectrum and prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Associations between P/LP variants and BC risk were estimated in a case-control analysis of BC patients and 18,919 Brazilian reference controls (RC). In total, 335 (20.1%) participants carried germline P/LP variants: 167 (10.0%) in BRCA1/2, 122 (7.3%) in BC actionable non-BRCA genes and 47 (2.8%) in candidate genes or other cancer predisposition genes. Overall, 354 distinctive P/LP variants were identified in 23 genes. The most commonly mutated genes were: BRCA1 (27.4%), BRCA2 (20.3%), TP53 (10.5%), monoallelic MUTYH (9.9%), ATM (8.8%), CHEK2 (6.2%) and PALB2 (5.1%). The Brazilian variant TP53 R337H (c.1010G>A, p.Arg337His), detected in 1.6% of BC patients and 0.1% of RC, was strongly associated with risk of BC, OR = 17.4 (95% CI: 9.4-32.1; p < 0.0001); monoallelic MUTYH variants c.1187G>A and c.536A>G, detected in 1.2% (0.9% RC) and 0.8% (0.4% RC) of the patients, respectively, were not associated with the odds of BC, the former with OR = 1.4 (95% CI: 0.8-2.4; p = 0.29) and the latter with OR = 1.9 (95% CI: 0.9-3.9; p = 0.09). The overall VUS rate was 46.1% for the entire patient population. Concluding, the use of multigene panel testing almost doubled the identification of germline P/LP variants in clinically actionable predisposition genes in BC patients. In Brazil, special attention should be given to TP53 P/LP variants.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBrazilFemaleGenes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm CellsGerm-Line MutationHumans

Identifiers

PMID35264596
PMCPMC8907244
OpenAlexW4220900070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.