Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35264574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Symbiotic bacteria of the gall-inducing mite Fragariocoptes setiger (Eriophyoidea) and phylogenomic resolution of the eriophyoid position among Acari.

Pavel B Klimov, Philipp E Chetverikov, Irina E Dodueva, Andrey E Vishnyakov, Samuel J Bolton, Svetlana S Paponova, Ljudmila A Lutova, Andrey V Tolstikov

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. mSystems · 2025
    Article
  4. A novelmSphere · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Genomic Assessment of the Contribution of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pavel B KlimovX-BIO Institute, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia, 625003. pklimov@umich.edu.
Philipp E ChetverikovSaint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199034. f.chetverikov@spbu.ru.
Irina E DoduevaSaint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Andrey E VishnyakovSaint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Samuel J BoltonFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Svetlana S PaponovaSaint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Ljudmila A LutovaSaint-Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 199034.
Andrey V TolstikovX-BIO Institute, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia, 625003.
St Petersburg University · RUUniversity of Tyumen · RUFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eriophyoid mites represent a hyperdiverse, phytophagous lineage with an unclear phylogenetic position. These mites have succeeded in colonizing nearly every seed plant species, and this evolutionary success was in part due to the mites' ability to induce galls in plants. A gall is a unique niche that provides the inducer of this modification with vital resources. The exact mechanism of gall formation is still not understood, even as to whether it is endogenic (mites directly cause galls) or exogenic (symbiotic microorganisms are involved). Here we (i) investigate the phylogenetic affinities of eriophyoids and (ii) use comparative metagenomics to test the hypothesis that the endosymbionts of eriophyoid mites are involved in gall formation. Our phylogenomic analysis robustly inferred eriophyoids as closely related to Nematalycidae, a group of deep-soil mites belonging to Endeostigmata. Our comparative metagenomics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and electron microscopy experiments identified two candidate endosymbiotic bacteria shared across samples, however, it is unlikely that they are gall inducers (morphotype1: novel Wolbachia, morphotype2: possibly Agrobacterium tumefaciens). We also detected an array of plant pathogens associated with galls that may be vectored by the mites, and we determined a mite pathogenic virus (Betabaculovirus) that could be tested for using in biocontrol of agricultural pest mites.

Indexed as

MitesAnimalsBacteriaBiological EvolutionIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePhylogenyPlants

Identifiers

PMID35264574
PMCPMC8907322
OpenAlexW4220661212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.